Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using a shallow git clone should cause a fatal failure #372

Open
simondeziel opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #391
Open

Using a shallow git clone should cause a fatal failure #372

simondeziel opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #391
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@simondeziel
Copy link

simondeziel commented Apr 19, 2024

Type of issue

Bug Report

Description

If by mistake, one forgets to use fetch-depth: 0 with actions/checkout@v4, the action redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck@v5 will be unable to find the needed diff but will carry on:

Run actions/checkout@v4
Syncing repository: canonical/lxd-ci
Getting Git version info
Temporarily overriding HOME='/home/runner/work/_temp/909f679f-99cb-4e64-907a-ebed4d65f581' before making global git config changes
Adding repository directory to the temporary git global config as a safe directory
/usr/bin/git config --global --add safe.directory /home/runner/work/lxd-ci/lxd-ci
Deleting the contents of '/home/runner/work/lxd-ci/lxd-ci'
Initializing the repository
Disabling automatic garbage collection
Setting up auth
Fetching the repository
Determining the checkout info
Checking out the ref
/usr/bin/git log -1 --format='%H'
'35edb903e0835de501914bb32133d88136bcbef1'
Run redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck@v5
/usr/bin/docker run --name ghcrioredhatplumbersinactiondifferentialshellcheckv511_860cec --label ae11f4 --workdir /github/workspace --rm -e "INPUT_TOKEN" -e "INPUT_TRIGGERING-EVENT" -e "INPUT_BASE" -e "INPUT_HEAD" -e "INPUT_PULL-REQUEST-BASE" -e "INPUT_PULL-REQUEST-HEAD" -e "INPUT_PUSH-EVENT-BASE" -e "INPUT_PUSH-EVENT-HEAD" -e "INPUT_DIFF-SCAN" -e "INPUT_STRICT-CHECK-ON-PUSH" -e "INPUT_EXTERNAL-SOURCES" -e "INPUT_SEVERITY" -e "INPUT_SCAN-DIRECTORY" -e "INPUT_EXCLUDE-PATH" -e "INPUT_INCLUDE-PATH" -e "INPUT_TRIGGERING_EVENT" -e "INPUT_PULL_REQUEST_BASE" -e "INPUT_PULL_REQUEST_HEAD" -e "INPUT_PUSH_EVENT_BASE" -e "INPUT_PUSH_EVENT_HEAD" -e "INPUT_DIFF_SCAN" -e "INPUT_STRICT_CHECK_ON_PUSH" -e "INPUT_EXTERNAL_SOURCES" -e "INPUT_SCAN_DIRECTORY" -e "INPUT_EXCLUDE_PATH" -e "INPUT_INCLUDE_PATH" -e "HOME" -e "GITHUB_JOB" -e "GITHUB_REF" -e "GITHUB_SHA" -e "GITHUB_REPOSITORY" -e "GITHUB_REPOSITORY_OWNER" -e "GITHUB_REPOSITORY_OWNER_ID" -e "GITHUB_RUN_ID" -e "GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER" -e "GITHUB_RETENTION_DAYS" -e "GITHUB_RUN_ATTEMPT" -e "GITHUB_REPOSITORY_ID" -e "GITHUB_ACTOR_ID" -e "GITHUB_ACTOR" -e "GITHUB_TRIGGERING_ACTOR" -e "GITHUB_WORKFLOW" -e "GITHUB_HEAD_REF" -e "GITHUB_BASE_REF" -e "GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" -e "GITHUB_SERVER_URL" -e "GITHUB_API_URL" -e "GITHUB_GRAPHQL_URL" -e "GITHUB_REF_NAME" -e "GITHUB_REF_PROTECTED" -e "GITHUB_REF_TYPE" -e "GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF" -e "GITHUB_WORKFLOW_SHA" -e "GITHUB_WORKSPACE" -e "GITHUB_ACTION" -e "GITHUB_EVENT_PATH" -e "GITHUB_ACTION_REPOSITORY" -e "GITHUB_ACTION_REF" -e "GITHUB_PATH" -e "GITHUB_ENV" -e "GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY" -e "GITHUB_STATE" -e "GITHUB_OUTPUT" -e "RUNNER_OS" -e "RUNNER_ARCH" -e "RUNNER_NAME" -e "RUNNER_ENVIRONMENT" -e "RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE" -e "RUNNER_TEMP" -e "RUNNER_WORKSPACE" -e "ACTIONS_RUNTIME_URL" -e "ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN" -e "ACTIONS_CACHE_URL" -e "ACTIONS_RESULTS_URL" -e GITHUB_ACTIONS=true -e CI=true -v "/var/run/docker.sock":"/var/run/docker.sock" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_github_home":"/github/home" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_github_workflow":"/github/workflow" -v "/home/runner/work/_temp/_runner_file_commands":"/github/file_commands" -v "/home/runner/work/lxd-ci/lxd-ci":"/github/workspace" ghcr.io/redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck:v5.1.1
fatal: Invalid revision range 6034829bebd5755843be3ce8b8dee1e55afe1515..c31bb3595fab371d8e5d9265ceb9d210baf4c398


:::::::::::::::::::::
::: Used Versions :::
:::::::::::::::::::::

ShellCheck: 0.9.0
csutils: 3.2.0


:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::: Differential ShellCheck :::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

📜 List of shell scripts for scanning
  

fatal: reference is not a tree: 6034829bebd5755843be3ce8b8dee1e55afe1515
fatal: reference is not a tree: 6034829bebd5755843be3ce8b8dee1e55afe1515
ℹ️ No Fixes!

error: pathspec '-' did not match any file(s) known to git
🥳 No defects added. Yay!

✅ SARIF report was successfully uploaded to GitHub

Those logs are from https://github.com/canonical/lxd-ci/actions/runs/8756699425/job/24033740622?pr=155#step:5:13

Omitting that force-depth: 0 is quite easy and considering that action/checkout changed the default in their v4 it feels safe to have some more safeguard in this action.

Describe the solution you'd like

IMHO, this fatal: Invalid revision range <commit..commit> error should cause the whole action to return an error.

simondeziel added a commit to simondeziel/lxd-ci that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2024
`actions/checkout@v4` moved to shallow clones by default:
https://github.com/actions/checkout?tab=readme-ov-file#checkout-v4

This prevents the differential shellcheck action from finding the proper revs:

```
fatal: Invalid revision range 6034829..c31bb35
```

Now why is the action not failing in those case is another story
(redhat-plumbers-in-action/differential-shellcheck#372).

Signed-off-by: Simon Deziel <[email protected]>
@jamacku jamacku self-assigned this Apr 19, 2024
@jamacku
Copy link
Member

jamacku commented Apr 19, 2024

Yes, this is a good point. Thank you for reporting. I'll have a look.

@jamacku jamacku added RFE 🎁 and removed bug 🐛 labels Apr 19, 2024
@jamacku jamacku pinned this issue Apr 19, 2024
@jamacku jamacku linked a pull request Apr 26, 2024 that will close this issue
@jamacku jamacku reopened this Apr 26, 2024
@jamacku jamacku unpinned this issue Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants