-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Readme: Compare to Rx/IObservable/Ix/AsyncEnumerable #15
Comments
Second. I had a lot of exposure to Reactive Extensions, though this seems more advanced with back pressure features which RX is lacking. I only learned of this project from looking at Akka |
Some (including me) would argue that RX isn't lacking backpressure at all: there's Ix for consumer-paced psuedo-reactive pipelines. |
I came across this issue when looking for just such a comparison. The next, error, complete semantics seems pretty similar. Some use case examples would be great. |
There is a long discussion about RX/IX and Reactive.Streams in the RX.Net repository and you can take a look at #19, maybe that helps. Long story short, the way I see it is that Reactive.Streams provide the push behavior from RX + the back pressure from IX without the additional cost of allocating a |
I think it'd be good to have a section or separate document that highlights the differences with the existing Rx/Ix for .Net - a lot of interested people are bound to have experience with that and might be confused with how this is different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: