This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Recent GHA/VirtualBox issues #1
Comments
Thanks @acj! I've been hitting the same issues in py-spy with freebsd CI - and have had to re-run several times to get a successful run on recent PR's. I'm going to try out option 1 with py-spy and remoteprocess, and will let you know how its going |
benfred
added a commit
to benfred/py-spy
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Fix freebsd ci issues, as mentioned in rbspy/freebsd-vagrant-box#1
benfred
added a commit
to benfred/py-spy
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Fix freebsd ci issues, as mentioned in rbspy/freebsd-vagrant-box#1
benfred
added a commit
to benfred/remoteprocess
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Fix freebsd ci issues, as mentioned in rbspy/freebsd-vagrant-box#1
benfred
added a commit
to benfred/remoteprocess
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2023
Fix freebsd ci issues, as mentioned in rbspy/freebsd-vagrant-box#1
I've changed over remoteprocess and py-spy to match rbspy/proc-maps. This really sped up the freebsd ci - and seems to be improving the reliability. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Something changed a couple of weeks ago that is causing FreeBSD guest VMs to fail on GitHub Actions. I don't know whether the change was in GHA or VirtualBox or something else, but it's resisted my troubleshooting. The most common behavior is that the VMs cause the runner to hard-fail and not produce any useful logging.
The good news is that there are a couple of workarounds:
I've updated rbspy and proc-maps to use option 1.
With better options available now, I'm thinking about archiving this repo.
cc @benfred - I would guess that py-spy CI is struggling in the same way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: