Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance search results #68

Open
rasa opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Enhance search results #68

rasa opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@rasa
Copy link
Owner

rasa commented Nov 11, 2021

  1. Add favicon
  2. Add bucket's stars
  3. Add update date?
@rashil2000
Copy link
Collaborator

rashil2000 commented Nov 15, 2021

Another suggestion: some indicator in the results for apps from official buckets - will be useful for quickly visually filtering out supported apps (as opposed to user-defined buckets).
Will have to maintain an array of official bucket URLs in the search.html file.

@rasa
Copy link
Owner Author

rasa commented Nov 15, 2021

@rashil2000 Or we do something like:

SELECT
  ...
  b.official
WHERE
 apps a
INNER JOIN
  buckets b ON b.id = a.bucket_id
...

?

@rasa
Copy link
Owner Author

rasa commented Nov 15, 2021

What about adding some selects and check-boxes to the search function:

  • Order by: [ name/version , popularity , freshness , ... ]
  • Results: [100 , 200 , 400 , 800 , 1600 , all]
  • Official buckets only
  • FOSS only
    ?

@rashil2000
Copy link
Collaborator

@rashil2000 Or we do something like:

SELECT
  ...
  b.official
WHERE
 apps a
INNER JOIN
  buckets b ON b.id = a.bucket_id
...

?

Won't this only show apps in official buckets? I was thinking of something similar to a checkmark ✔ of sorts. Here the number of results will be the same as before - just the official bucket rows will have the checkmark somewhere.

Repository owner deleted a comment from a2425rdl Apr 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants