Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use anscestor relations in predicates #27

Open
cbizon opened this issue Sep 19, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Use anscestor relations in predicates #27

cbizon opened this issue Sep 19, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@cbizon
Copy link
Contributor

cbizon commented Sep 19, 2020

Currently there are two thoughts for using edges in coalescence.

  1. only coalesce when edge preds are the same
  2. Ignore edge preds

One extension: Use predicate subclasses. So don't require perfect equality, but allow subclassing. If A-[increases expression of]-B and A-[related to]-C, then B and C should be allowed to coalesce with a predicate of the superclass (related to).

In fact, if the edge preds are ignored, maybe we should consider that as merging at the lowest common superproperty.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant