You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently there are two thoughts for using edges in coalescence.
only coalesce when edge preds are the same
Ignore edge preds
One extension: Use predicate subclasses. So don't require perfect equality, but allow subclassing. If A-[increases expression of]-B and A-[related to]-C, then B and C should be allowed to coalesce with a predicate of the superclass (related to).
In fact, if the edge preds are ignored, maybe we should consider that as merging at the lowest common superproperty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently there are two thoughts for using edges in coalescence.
One extension: Use predicate subclasses. So don't require perfect equality, but allow subclassing. If A-[increases expression of]-B and A-[related to]-C, then B and C should be allowed to coalesce with a predicate of the superclass (related to).
In fact, if the edge preds are ignored, maybe we should consider that as merging at the lowest common superproperty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: