You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This syntax isn't user-friendly, and we now support frontends for TechRule and DesignerRule from ODM through Java frontends. I believe those rely on the s-expression format for CAMPRule and CAMP.
The OCaml parsers for CAMPRule and CAMP are based on the pretty-printing syntax from Coq, which we used originally as scaffolding. Should we remove those?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This syntax isn't user-friendly, and we now support frontends for TechRule and DesignerRule from ODM through Java frontends. I believe those rely on the s-expression format for CAMPRule and CAMP.
The OCaml parsers for CAMPRule and CAMP are based on the pretty-printing syntax from Coq, which we used originally as scaffolding. Should we remove those?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: