We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
quarkus-asyncapi/quarkus-asyncapi-scanner/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkiverse/asyncapi/annotation/scanner/AsyncApiHandler.java
Line 101 in 79caba0
The code uses the specified version in quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion to resolve 3 separate packages:
quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion
@asyncapi/web-component
@webcomponents/webcomponentsjs
@asyncapi/react-component
This just doesn't work, either it should resolve to a single package with the 3 packages as dependencies or the version specified separately
Current workaround is to specify quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion=latest so it resolves the 'latest' of each package
quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion=latest
Version: 0.2.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
quarkus-asyncapi/quarkus-asyncapi-scanner/runtime/src/main/java/io/quarkiverse/asyncapi/annotation/scanner/AsyncApiHandler.java
Line 101 in 79caba0
The code uses the specified version in
quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion
to resolve 3 separate packages:@asyncapi/web-component
@webcomponents/webcomponentsjs
@asyncapi/react-component
This just doesn't work, either it should resolve to a single package with the 3 packages as dependencies or the version specified separately
Current workaround is to specify
quarkus.asyncapi.annotation.scanner.webcomponentversion=latest
so it resolves the 'latest' of each packageVersion: 0.2.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: