Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider full migration to Bazel #69

Open
95-martin-orion opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Consider full migration to Bazel #69

95-martin-orion opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@95-martin-orion
Copy link
Collaborator

There are a couple of discrepancies between the Bazel- and Makefile-driven builds of qsim - most recently, we found that input files referenced by Bazel require a different relative address than when building with Make.

One possible solution to this is to fully migrate off of Make and require all users to build qsim with Bazel. The goal of this issue is to collect feedback on this proposal; we have not yet decided on this migration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant