You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a recurring question on the quantum stack exchange, and the dem stuff is too not-the-abstraction-they-are-using for beginners.
What I'm thinking is basically the following: every error channel specifies some number of "which error" bits, e.g. X_ERROR has 1 and DEPOLARIZE2 has 4. While the frame simulator runs it can optionally stash these bits. The compiled circuit sampler's sample method would gain an option record_errors=True, or maybe an alternate method, which would add the error data to the result tuple. There should also be an option to convert the errors from these raw bits into their explained form (and vice versa), so users don't have to do that task.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a recurring question on the quantum stack exchange, and the dem stuff is too not-the-abstraction-they-are-using for beginners.
What I'm thinking is basically the following: every error channel specifies some number of "which error" bits, e.g. X_ERROR has 1 and DEPOLARIZE2 has 4. While the frame simulator runs it can optionally stash these bits. The compiled circuit sampler's sample method would gain an option
record_errors=True
, or maybe an alternate method, which would add the error data to the result tuple. There should also be an option to convert the errors from these raw bits into their explained form (and vice versa), so users don't have to do that task.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: