Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glitch with long barplot labels #93

Open
ElDeveloper opened this issue Sep 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Glitch with long barplot labels #93

ElDeveloper opened this issue Sep 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
type:bug Something is wrong.

Comments

@ElDeveloper
Copy link
Member

ElDeveloper commented Sep 9, 2017

Bug Description
When the barplot label for a particular taxon is too long, and the space above the plot overflows, this moves the entire plot, causing it to change from taxon on-focus, so the space will no longer overflow, and go back to the initial taxon that caused the overflow. It's a bit hard to explain, and caught me by surprise

Screenshots
glitch

@jairideout jairideout added the type:bug Something is wrong. label Sep 11, 2017
@emford
Copy link

emford commented Oct 15, 2019

I will attempt this one 👍

@Oddant1
Copy link
Member

Oddant1 commented Jan 23, 2020

Is this not to some extent inherent to having an overlong taxon? No matter how much padding we put on the top of the plot surely a long enough taxon would overflow the given amount of space?

@thermokarst
Copy link
Contributor

@Oddant1, that is correct, it is good to assume that it'll always overflow. The concern here is that when it overflows it pushes everything down by one line. If we change the vertical alignment of the element to align to the bottom of the element, and increase the overall element size to two or three lines, we can probably negate the issue a bit. Does that make sense?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:bug Something is wrong.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants