Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pslurp can't use rsync #84

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

pslurp can't use rsync #84

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Any invocation of pslurp (that I've tried).

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

I expected pslurp to use rsync, but it seems to use scp.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

pssh 2.2.2 on Ubuntu 12.04.

Please provide any additional information below.

This is more of a feature request than a bug report I guess... It'd be nice if 
pslurp (or some other command like pslurp) could fetch files from multiple 
remote hosts to one local hosts, but using rsync. Basically the exact converse 
of prsync.

(The particular rsync features I miss are the ability to copy a directory to 
either a subdirectory or the current directory on the target; and the 
preservation of file modification times.)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 23 May 2013 at 8:25

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

That seems like a reasonable feature.

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 May 2013 at 6:53

  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

To this post I've attached a modified version that will take a --rsync option 
to use rsync rather than scp.

Original comment by [email protected] on 19 Jun 2013 at 9:19

Attachments:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant