Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pscp, prsync, and pslurp man pages have wrong name #74

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

pscp, prsync, and pslurp man pages have wrong name #74

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 22, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. man pscp (or prsync or pslurp)
2. look in the NAME section

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
expected (e.g.): pscp - parallel secure copy
see instead: parallel process kill program

What version of the product are you using?
2.3.1

On what operating system?
cygwin

Please provide any additional information below.
commit 846796e941c178cf3165b1676fb2655ebda48149

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 31 Jul 2012 at 8:13

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the late response--somehow I was never sent an email when this issue 
was created. :(

On my system, the man pages show the NAME correctly: "pscp — parallel process 
kill program", "pssh — parallel ssh program". I also tried checking out the 
specific commit you mention, and I'm seeing the same thing. Is it possible that 
there's something weird with man on your system? The one thing I can think of 
is that it's a "—" instead of a "-", so perhaps a non-Unicode terminal might 
mangle the line.

Original comment by [email protected] on 27 Sep 2012 at 3:27

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

yes, the name is correct.  It's the description, in the NAME section, that is 
wrong.  Even in your own quote, the incorrect text is present. 

you said:

On my system, the man pages show the NAME correctly: "pscp — parallel process 
kill program", 


Original comment by [email protected] on 27 Sep 2012 at 4:38

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Oh, I see now. I had just misread. When you said: "see instead: parallel 
process kill program", I thought the problem was that it was missing "pscp". 
Thanks for pointing out this problem.

Original comment by [email protected] on 27 Sep 2012 at 5:34

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Issue 89 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Sep 2013 at 11:56

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant