From 2695cd92c235e954955a2d7d721d394ea0149ca2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:45:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Simplify .filter().next() into .find()

I would have thought clippy already complains about this...? Or does the
intermediate .map() confuse it, perhaps?

Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
---
 x11rb/src/cursor/find_cursor.rs | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x11rb/src/cursor/find_cursor.rs b/x11rb/src/cursor/find_cursor.rs
index e8c6dd78..2b0d4170 100644
--- a/x11rb/src/cursor/find_cursor.rs
+++ b/x11rb/src/cursor/find_cursor.rs
@@ -96,9 +96,8 @@ static CORE_CURSORS: &[(&str, u16)] = &[
 fn cursor_shape_to_id(name: &str) -> Option<u16> {
     CORE_CURSORS
         .iter()
-        .filter(|&(name2, _)| name == *name2)
+        .find(|&(name2, _)| name == *name2)
         .map(|&(_, id)| id)
-        .next()
 }
 
 #[cfg(test)]