Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update codeql.yml #204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Update codeql.yml #204

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

zubri
Copy link
Member

@zubri zubri commented Sep 18, 2024

temporal change to force scan on specific branch

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the pull request trigger configuration to include a specific branch for enhanced monitoring of code security reports.

temporal change to force scan on specific branch
@zubri zubri merged commit a83296c into main Sep 18, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the pull_request trigger configuration in the .github/workflows/codeql.yml file. The configuration now includes a specific branch, "CU-86b14j4e0_SRU2024_check-code-security-reports-at-GitHub-for-all-repos", in addition to the existing patterns "main", "CU-", and "SRU". This adjustment allows the workflow to respond to pull requests from this particular branch, enhancing the specificity of the branch triggers.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Added pull_request branch trigger for CU-86b14j4e0_SRU2024_check-code-security-reports-at-GitHub-for-all-repos

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow

    User->>GitHub: Create pull request from CU-86b14j4e0_SRU2024_check-code-security-reports-at-GitHub-for-all-repos
    GitHub->>Workflow: Trigger workflow for pull request
    Workflow-->>GitHub: Execute code analysis
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for code reviews. This model has advanced reasoning capabilities and can provide more nuanced feedback on your code.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

@zubri zubri deleted the zubri-patch-1 branch September 18, 2024 18:32
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant