Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove empty __init__.py files #176

Open
2 tasks done
wjbmattingly opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #178
Open
2 tasks done

Remove empty __init__.py files #176

wjbmattingly opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #178
Assignees
Labels
development enhancement New feature to add to the code Low Low priority task

Comments

@wjbmattingly
Copy link

wjbmattingly commented Dec 9, 2024

Description

Remove unnecessary empty __init__.py files from the codebase. These files were required in Python 2 to mark directories as packages but are optional in Python 3.3+ and add unnecessary clutter to our codebase.

Tasks

  • Scan codebase for empty __init__.py files
  • Remove identified empty files

Technical Details

  • Target: Empty __init__.py files only
  • Keep files containing actual code/imports
  • Python 3.3+ implicit namespace packages will handle directory marking

Testing

  • Run full test suite after removal
  • Verify package imports work in development environment
  • Check build process completes successfully
@wjbmattingly wjbmattingly added the enhancement New feature to add to the code label Dec 9, 2024
@wjbmattingly wjbmattingly linked a pull request Dec 9, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@wjbmattingly wjbmattingly linked a pull request Dec 9, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@wjbmattingly wjbmattingly added Low Low priority task development labels Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
development enhancement New feature to add to the code Low Low priority task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants