Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: In CodeLens, include weaver-backed aspects #119

Open
PeterHevesi opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request: In CodeLens, include weaver-backed aspects #119

PeterHevesi opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@PeterHevesi
Copy link

Hi,
I really love that feature, that shows what aspects where applied where. But I noticed, that it only works for standard Metalama aspects, but not for Weaver Aspects...
While I understand, that Metalama Diff will not work for aspect weavers any time soon (and maybe / probably never, which I am very sad about :D ), but at least the knowledge, that weaver was applied somewhere would be very nice :)

@PostSharpBot
Copy link
Member

Hello @PeterHevesi, thank you for submitting this issue. We will try to get back to you as soon as possible.
Note to the PostSharp team, this ticket is being tracked in our dashboard under ID TP-33080.

@gfraiteur gfraiteur changed the title FEATURE REQUEST: Would you please add indicator, that aspect weaver was applied via CodeLens? Feature request: In CodeLens, include weaver-backed aspects May 4, 2023
@gfraiteur gfraiteur added the enhancement New feature or request label May 4, 2023
@gfraiteur
Copy link
Member

It should be fairly easy indeed to include weaver-backed aspects in the CodeLens info.

@gfraiteur gfraiteur added this to the 2023.1 milestone May 9, 2023
@gfraiteur gfraiteur removed this from the 2023.1 milestone Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants