-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CPU time #82
Comments
Dear Mark, I created a new issue on my repo : bitranox/wrapt_timeout_decorator#49 yours sincerely |
Sounds good, thanks! We're double checking the idea with my colleagues and get back to you. Mark |
Dear Mark, yours sincerely |
Hi,
I'm using
timeout_decorator
for machine learning workloads, ensuring that parameter optimizations terminate below pre-defined timeout. This helps in my process, but my workflow became sensitive to any other workload happening on the same host.I wonder if terminating the function by CPU time is technically possible with the approach followed by
timeout_decorator
. This would ensure that the optmization step is independent of other processes using the host.Would this make sense, I could fork / create a new branch or send a pull request with proposed changes.
Let me know if this makes sense, and if you'd be interested in intergrating this in the existing codebase.
Thanks, Mark
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: