You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found the MANIFESTO and Pjotrp's recent Nature article inspiring (http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v33/n7/full/nbt.3240.html). However, at the end of my readings, I'm left with no action items. Perhaps this is because I am not a bioinformatician (I hope to get into this amazing field), but I am a computer scientist and studied mathematics. I could help, but I need to know with what. Can we get a current list of software that meets the requirements to start being a list?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That is a good idea. We have a bio-packaging mailing list at http://www.open-bio.org/wiki/Bio-packaging and I can compile a list of compliant packages on http://biogems.info/ (there is a list of Debian packages now, but not curated). GNU Guix is a good candidate too - I am working on that and you'll like their approach. Let's discuss on the bio-packaging ML.
I found the MANIFESTO and Pjotrp's recent Nature article inspiring (http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v33/n7/full/nbt.3240.html). However, at the end of my readings, I'm left with no action items. Perhaps this is because I am not a bioinformatician (I hope to get into this amazing field), but I am a computer scientist and studied mathematics. I could help, but I need to know with what. Can we get a current list of software that meets the requirements to start being a list?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: