Answer to "Add user to config file?" in vt_use_report is disregarded

[jan-imbi]

Answering n to the prompt "Add user to config file?" when using vt_use_report leads to a user being created anyways.

[thebioengineer]

That had been a conscious choice when we wrote the function to explicitly add a user to record who generated the validation report. However, I do see how the prompting (which is not done by vt_use_report() but a separate function) is misleading.

We can definitely update that. However, I would point out that the default report does require there to be users documented in the config file when it generates the table of people involved in the validation effort.