Studio tree review

[pixelzoom]

@DianaTavares @arouinfar @Nancy-Salpepi The Studio tree is ready for review.

While Schrodinger is not finished, all of the model and view elements related to Schrodinger are present in the tree, and I'm expecting no additional PhET-iO elements to be added. Beware (and apologies) that you are likely to encounter assertion failures related to invalid (n,l,m) transitions -- just reload Studio if that happens while reviewing.

Things to review:

• Names of elements
• Structure of the tree, grouping, etc.
• Linked elements
• Over- and under-instrumentation
• phetioFeatured
• phetioReadonly
• phetioDocumentation
• Dynamic layout behavior when visibleProperty is changed

Feel free to report issues and change requests here, or create new issues, as you prefer.

[pixelzoom]

For this item:

• Dynamic layout behavior when visibleProperty is changed

Especially these elements that are at the top-level, under *Screen.view. The implemented behavior is in parentheses, happy to discuss changing that behavior if it seems appropriate/worthwhile.

• legendPanel.visibleProperty (nothing moves)
• lightControlPanel.visibleProperty (nothing moves)
• spectrometerAccordionBox.visibleProperty (nothing moves)
• electronEnergyLevelAccordionBox.visibleProperty (elements on the right will shift left)
• continuumNode.visibleProperty (radio buttons move left)
• experimentModelSwitch.visibleProperty (radio buttons move up)
• atomicModelPanel.selfVisibleProperty (nothing moves)
• timeControlNode.visibleProperty (nothing moves)

[pixelzoom]

#102 resulted in some minor PhET-iO changes under continuumNode, so please do your review using main (via phettest).

[pixelzoom]

In 1/27/25 design meeting with @DianaTavares @arouinfar @Nancy-Salpepi , we reviewed the remaining visibleProperty items in #100 (comment) and checked them off.

Is there anything else to do here?

[DianaTavares]

I don't have anything to add related to PhET-iO or this issue

[arouinfar]

I'd like to sanity check the phetioFeatured elements.