prooftree package name

[david-davies]

Hi,
(Apologies for using an issue to communicate, I couldn't find an email contact)
I authored and then abandoned the prooftree package.
Please let me know if you'd like to use that package name, as curryst is better and actually maintained.
I don't want to be hogging the prooftree namespace :)

Best,
David

[MDLC01]

I believe it was an error on the Typst team's part to allow prooftree as a package name in the first place, because it is too descriptive. I'm not sure it makes sense to delete your package, nor does it make sense to now start using the prooftree name for the aforementioned reason. Of course, Paul will decide, as the owner of the package, but I think you could just change your README on Typst Universe to mention that prooftree is deprecated, and curryst should now be used (if you feel like it, of course).

[david-davies]

In the meantime I'll do as you suggested; mark it as deprecated and point towards curryst.