Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support resolving scalar functions by name #515

Open
sadderchris opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support resolving scalar functions by name #515

sadderchris opened this issue Oct 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sadderchris
Copy link

sadderchris commented Oct 24, 2024

Right now it's only possible to resolve scalar functions by ID (+ the specific overload you want). This works, but anyone directly constructing logical plans with scalar function calls has to implement overload resolution logic for each scalar function. This couples the code to PLR implementation details, at least when resolving built-in functions, since it's necessary to understand in what order the overloads are defined and what kinds of overloads are available in order to properly construct a call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant