You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now it's only possible to resolve scalar functions by ID (+ the specific overload you want). This works, but anyone directly constructing logical plans with scalar function calls has to implement overload resolution logic for each scalar function. This couples the code to PLR implementation details, at least when resolving built-in functions, since it's necessary to understand in what order the overloads are defined and what kinds of overloads are available in order to properly construct a call.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now it's only possible to resolve scalar functions by ID (+ the specific overload you want). This works, but anyone directly constructing logical plans with scalar function calls has to implement overload resolution logic for each scalar function. This couples the code to PLR implementation details, at least when resolving built-in functions, since it's necessary to understand in what order the overloads are defined and what kinds of overloads are available in order to properly construct a call.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: