You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first things first: Thanks a stack for conceiving sphinx-sqlite3fts, we absolutely love it. Because you archived the repository at [1], and [2] did not enable issue tracking yet, we have not been able to create a corresponding ticket to get in touch with you over there, so we are doing it hereby.
On this repository, we friendly-forked your code base to explore the feasability to use different search backends. For example, there is a little patch to start adding support for PostgreSQL already (WIP).
Those changes are not easy to make compatible with the SQLite backend, most prominently it will not be possible to pull off the same trick of embedding the SQLite database into the browser, accessing it through WASM.
So, we guess it is appropriate to durably fork the code base with slightly different goals in mind, because we believe you will never accept corresponding patches, as it would detour from the philosophy of sphinx-sqlite3fts too much. However, if you see a chance to run a hybrid repository, unifying different search backends, please let us know, so that we can adjust our thinking.
Other than this, please also let us know about other ways how we can be supportive for the parent repository you are running over at [2]. Please keep up your excellent work.
Dear @attakei,
first things first: Thanks a stack for conceiving
sphinx-sqlite3fts
, we absolutely love it. Because you archived the repository at [1], and [2] did not enable issue tracking yet, we have not been able to create a corresponding ticket to get in touch with you over there, so we are doing it hereby.On this repository, we friendly-forked your code base to explore the feasability to use different search backends. For example, there is a little patch to start adding support for PostgreSQL already (WIP).
Those changes are not easy to make compatible with the SQLite backend, most prominently it will not be possible to pull off the same trick of embedding the SQLite database into the browser, accessing it through WASM.
So, we guess it is appropriate to durably fork the code base with slightly different goals in mind, because we believe you will never accept corresponding patches, as it would detour from the philosophy of
sphinx-sqlite3fts
too much. However, if you see a chance to run a hybrid repository, unifying different search backends, please let us know, so that we can adjust our thinking.Other than this, please also let us know about other ways how we can be supportive for the parent repository you are running over at [2]. Please keep up your excellent work.
With kind regards,
Andreas.
[1] https://github.com/attakei-lab/sphinx-sqlite3fts
[2] https://github.com/atsphinx/sqlite3fts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: