We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We test: FsF-F4-01M-1- Metadata is given in a way major search engines can ingest it for their catalogues (JSON-LD, Dublin Core, RDFa)
DCAT is not (yet) widely supported, but since at least Google recognises it (as RDFa) I think it could be included to the list.
See: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structured-data/dataset?hl=en
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FYI we (VLIZ - EMBRC - FAIR EASE) use dcat a lot in our RDF metadata files
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
We test: FsF-F4-01M-1- Metadata is given in a way major search engines can ingest it for their catalogues (JSON-LD, Dublin Core, RDFa)
DCAT is not (yet) widely supported, but since at least Google recognises it (as RDFa) I think it could be included to the list.
See: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structured-data/dataset?hl=en
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: