Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (93 loc) · 3.95 KB

iterate_on_your_resources.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (93 loc) · 3.95 KB

Iterate on your resources

In your Terraform code, you may need to declare a resource or a module mutliple times, and you don't want to repeat yourself. In order to do so, there are multiple ways.

TL;DR

Prefer using a for_each than a count when you want to declare a resource multiple times with some changes Use count mechanism for feature flags when you want to activate or not a part of your code

Object iteration (for_each)

When you want to declare the same resource type multiple times, with some configuration changes in each occurence (take an azurerm_network_security_rule in an azurerm_network_security_group for example), you will prefer to use a map of objects and iterate on it to configure your resources.

Using this feature allow you to attribute a named key to your declaration and to clearly identify your resources in your terraform code. When you will want to delete an instance, terraform will be able to find it by its key and delete it without any impact on other instance in the map.

terraform code using for_each:


locals {
    nsr_map = {
        "rule-1" = {
            source_address_prefix = "10.1.0.0/28"
        },
        "rule-2" = {
            source_address_prefix = "10.2.1.0/28"
        },
    }
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_group" "example" {
    name = "example"
    ...
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "examples" {
    for_each = local.nsr_map
    name = each.key
    source_address_prefix = each.value.source_address_prefix
}

state list of a for_each:

terraform state list

azurerm_network_security_group.example
azurerm_network_security_rule.examples["rule-1"]
azurerm_network_security_rule.examples["rule-2"]

However, it's not recommanded to use a for_each by creating a map from a list, because a lists are deterministics and it will enforce the recreation of each instance. Beside, think about changing your list into another type.

bad use of for_each:

locals {
    nsr_list = [
        { "name": "rule-1", source_address_prefix = "10.0.1.0/28" },
        { "name": "rule-2", source_address_prefix = "10.0.2.0/28" },
    ]
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_group" "example" {
    name = "example"
    ...
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "examples" {
    for_each = {for v in local.nsr_list : v.name => v.source_address_list }
    name = each.key
    source_address_prefix = each.value
}

List iteration (count)

Iterate on a list using a count feature is not a good solution for many reasons. Most of the time, you will want to create resources with some changes in each iteration and you will need to iterate on a third-part list of objects in order to pass configurations. Your terraform code will be more complex to understand with to much logic in it.

Moreover, using count feature enforce resources deletion / recreation when you remove an item in the middle of your iteration list. If your terraform code has some design issues, you may destroy resources you don't want to.

terraform code using count:

locals {
    nsr_list = [
        { "name": "rule-1", source_address_prefix = "10.0.1.0/28" },
        { "name": "rule-2", source_address_prefix = "10.0.2.0/28" },
    ]
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_group" "example" {
    name = "example"
    ...
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "examples" {
    count = length(local.nsr_list)
    name = local[count.index].name
    source_address_prefix = local[count.index].source_address_prefix
}

Nevertheless, count feature is a good way to create if like behaviour in terraform. You may need it create some feature flags in your terraform code.

feature flag code using count:

locals {
    enable_nsr = false
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_group" "example" {
    name = "example"
    ...
}

resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "example" {
    count = local.enable_nsr ? 1 : 0
    name = "rule-1"
    source_address_prefix = "10.0.0.1/28"
}