We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Working around #4595 I tried to import an image using a URL like this:
dap@ivanova ~ $ echo '{"name": "my-image", "description": "dummy", "os": "debian", "version": "11", "source": { "type": "url", "url": "http://catacomb.eng.oxide.computer/media/cloud/debian-11-genericcloud-amd64.raw", "block_size": 512 } }' | oxide image create --name my-image --description my-description --os debian --version 11 --json-body /dev/stdin error Error Response: status: 400 Bad Request; headers: {"content-type": "application/json", "x-request-id": "208426d0-dafd-40ad-94be-2e5566bb2737", "content-length": "380", "date": "Fri, 01 Dec 2023 17:21:52 GMT"}; value: Error { error_code: Some("InvalidValue"), message: "unsupported value for \"url\": error querying url: error sending request for url (http://catacomb.eng.oxide.computer/media/cloud/debian-11-genericcloud-amd64.raw): error trying to connect: dns error: failed to lookup address information: node name or service name not known", request_id: "208426d0-dafd-40ad-94be-2e5566bb2737" }
I assume it's saying that Nexus (or maybe some part of Crucible?) failed to resolve catacomb.eng.oxide.computer in DNS. But it's in the public DNS:
catacomb.eng.oxide.computer
$ dig catacomb.eng.oxide.computer @1.1.1.1 ; <<>> DiG 9.18.19 <<>> catacomb.eng.oxide.computer @1.1.1.1 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53583 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;catacomb.eng.oxide.computer. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: catacomb.eng.oxide.computer. 120 IN A 172.20.0.5 ;; Query time: 74 msec ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) (UDP) ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 01 09:27:16 PST 2023 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 72
I'm wondering if whoever's doing this DNS resolution isn't using the right DNS servers? (But then how does this ever work?)
In case it matters, this system (madrid) was configured with these DNS servers (as in, these were in the rack setup config file I gave to wicket):
dns_servers = [ "1.1.1.1", "9.9.9.9", ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Obsoleted by #2898.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Working around #4595 I tried to import an image using a URL like this:
I assume it's saying that Nexus (or maybe some part of Crucible?) failed to resolve
catacomb.eng.oxide.computer
in DNS. But it's in the public DNS:I'm wondering if whoever's doing this DNS resolution isn't using the right DNS servers? (But then how does this ever work?)
In case it matters, this system (madrid) was configured with these DNS servers (as in, these were in the rack setup config file I gave to wicket):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: