From 2fc6b515e33f83614b4eda90516128419d64eb81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pablo Rosado Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:38:06 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Add clarification --- etl/steps/data/garden/animal_welfare/2024-12-17/fur_laws.py | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/etl/steps/data/garden/animal_welfare/2024-12-17/fur_laws.py b/etl/steps/data/garden/animal_welfare/2024-12-17/fur_laws.py index 149537707db..704b0aac89f 100644 --- a/etl/steps/data/garden/animal_welfare/2024-12-17/fur_laws.py +++ b/etl/steps/data/garden/animal_welfare/2024-12-17/fur_laws.py @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ def prepare_fur_farming_ban_status(tb: Table) -> Table: # Check that when phase out is "YES", the ban status is empty. #################################################################################################################### # For Belgium, both columns "Fur farming ban" and "Phase-out due to stricter regulations" are "YES". - # This happens in the google sheet, but not in the PDF (where only "Fur farming ban" is "YES"). - # So I assume the PDF is correct. + # In this case, assume the stronger status, which is banned. # NOTE: I confirmed this with Fur Free Alliance. error = ( "Expected Belgium to have both a fur farming ban and a phase out due to stricter regulations. "