Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

navigation message generation code explanation - dwrd[60] instead of dwrd[50] #420

Open
virat-fan18 opened this issue Oct 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@virat-fan18
Copy link

virat-fan18 commented Oct 27, 2024

dwrd[60] - But isn't it enough if the 5th subframe is sent only the first time of the total duration? If we do it everytime while we send the navigation message is sent - aren't we sending the subframes like 5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5...etc .Wouldn't this be wrong as It should be 5-1-2-3-4-5-1-2-3-4-5-1-2....etc(as you meantioned in aprevious issue thatwe have to simulate for a time before the transmission time ) ? Great work with the code by the way .

Originally posted by @virat-fan18 in #180 (comment)

@virat-fan18 virat-fan18 changed the title But isn't it enough if the 5th subframe is sent only the first time of the total duration? If we do it everytime while we send the navigation message is sent - aren't we sending like 5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5...etc .Wouldn't this be wrong ? Great work with the code by the way . navigation message generation code explanation - dwrd[60] instead of dwrd[50] Oct 27, 2024
@cehuidong
Copy link

dwrd[60] - But isn't it enough if the 5th subframe is sent only the first time of the total duration? If we do it everytime while we send the navigation message is sent - aren't we sending the subframes like 5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5,5-1-2-3-4-5...etc .Wouldn't this be wrong as It should be 5-1-2-3-4-5-1-2-3-4-5-1-2....etc(as you meantioned in aprevious issue thatwe have to simulate for a time before the transmission time ) ? Great work with the code by the way .

Originally posted by @virat-fan18 in #180 (comment)

Because dwrd 9 and 59 are identical. I don't know if I'm right, but I think the principle of the part is as shown in the picture:
绘图1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants