Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Carapace integrates into the standard zsh completion framework, so for the most part things should just work. Tagging and colored highlightingCarapace makes extensive use of tagging and colored highlighting. fzf-tab has it's own mechanism to highlight groups so colors might differ. Custom file completionCarapace has its own file completion and in the sense of zsh these are just values. Central registryCarapace acts like a registry. So completions are primarily registered in carapace and then subsequently by it in Zsh. Normal completions registered directly in zsh still work, but as carapace overrides Order of registrationOrder of sourcing plugins can be an issue (at least in Powershell). For completions the last one to register overrides previous ones. So if you want to use the default completion of a command that carapace provides you either have to:
Completers
Comparing the completion with elvish might be useful to see if something is amiss (that one works best and does not need plugins).
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
All,
I recently saw carapace show up in the new formulae for brew and thought, oooh, looks cool!
But, my zsh setup is sort of a mish-mash of all sorts of things including zsh-completions, zsh-autosuggestions, fzf-tab, etc.
So I was wondering, is there any zsh plugin, etc. I should look out for that conflict with carapace? I don't want to try out carapace and draw the wrong opinion because I had other plugins causing issues!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions