Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc: add raven performance test #217

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

njucjc
Copy link
Member

@njucjc njucjc commented Sep 21, 2022

No description provided.

## 结论及分析

- 相较于同边访问:云-边互访带宽比为42.37(同边带宽/云-边带宽),边-云-边互访带宽比为3579.02(同边带宽/边-云-边带宽)
- 相较于同边访问:云-边互访延迟比为0.02(同边延迟/云-边延迟),边-云-边互访延迟比为0.01(同边延迟/边-云-边延迟)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

最后的结论分析,感觉主要还是物理网络造成的,无法体现raven本身的性能吧?

Copy link
Member Author

@njucjc njucjc Sep 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

我的想法是主要是体现使用raven进行跨边通信的网络性能(延迟和带宽)比直接使用cni的同边通信要差,物理网络也是一方面?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

嗯,主要是NodePool内部的cni通信,走的是内网,而云边raven走的是公网

@njucjc njucjc force-pushed the raven-performance-test branch from ba05422 to 874ae18 Compare September 21, 2022 02:40
@njucjc njucjc force-pushed the raven-performance-test branch from 874ae18 to 04de363 Compare September 21, 2022 02:56
Copy link
Member

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please resolve conflicts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants