You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See #110 and #122 for the motivation. Ops team sees this too much, and tokyo cabinet is unmaintained.
Currently it's an accident waiting to happen.
In the short term we still want to implement #122 so ops can monitor this more closely.
Possible replacement candidates:
rocksdb
could remove the need for head.db + collapsing could become cheap
db consists of multiple files, which would require some changes for catchup to handle this
lmdb
ocaml binding doesn't expose iterators / range queries
rest of the flow/code would remain the same
For both of these it should be possible to provide a way forward for existing clusters.
Either:
allow catchup of head.db in a database agnostic fashion (send key value pairs over the wire)
for each node: wipe it, let it catchup from the others
provide a method to export an old (head) db to the new database format
for each node: stop node, transform head db, remove main db, start node
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See #110 and #122 for the motivation. Ops team sees this too much, and tokyo cabinet is unmaintained.
Currently it's an accident waiting to happen.
In the short term we still want to implement #122 so ops can monitor this more closely.
Possible replacement candidates:
For both of these it should be possible to provide a way forward for existing clusters.
Either:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: