Ospp 2024/optimize schema generation #832
Conversation
…timizing code formatting
…tiny/tiny-engine into ospp-2024/004-ai-multimodal
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (6)
Line range hint
99-112: Component imports should be updated to 'element-ui'Imports are still pulling components from
@opentiny/vue, which is inconsistent with the new requirement to use Element UI.Update the import statements to use Element UI components:
- import { Layout, Row, Col, Button, Input, Notify, Loading, Dropdown as TinyDropdown, - DropdownMenu as TinyDropdownMenu, DropdownItem as TinyDropdownItem } from '@opentiny/vue' + import { Row, Col, Button, Input, Notification, Loading, Dropdown, + DropdownMenu, DropdownItem } from 'element-ui'Ensure that you also update component registrations:
- components: { - TinyLayout: Layout, - TinyButton: Button, - TinyRow: Row, - TinyCol: Col, - TinyInput: Input, - TinyDropdown, - TinyDropdownMenu, - TinyDropdownItem, - // ...other components - }, + components: { + ElRow: Row, + ElCol: Col, + ElButton: Button, + ElInput: Input, + ElDropdown: Dropdown, + ElDropdownMenu: DropdownMenu, + ElDropdownItem: DropdownItem, + // ...other components + },
Line range hint
203-380: Refactor script to use Vue 2 Options APIThe script section uses Vue 3 Composition API features like
setup(),ref(), andwatchEffect(), which are not compatible with Vue 2.Refactor the component to use Vue 2 Options API:
- Replace
setup()withexport defaultcontainingdata(),methods,computed, etc.- Replace
ref,reactive, andwatchEffectwith Vue 2 equivalents.- Adjust lifecycle hooks to Vue 2 syntax (
mounted,watch, etc.).Example refactoring the
setupfunction:- export default { - // ...other options - setup() { - const avatarUrl = ref('') - onMounted(() => { - avatarUrl.value = 'img/defaultAvator.png' - }) - // ...rest of the setup code - return { - avatarUrl, - // ...other returned properties - } - } - } + export default { + // ...other options + data() { + return { + avatarUrl: 'img/defaultAvator.png', + // ...other data properties + } + }, + mounted() { + // ...mounted logic if needed + }, + methods: { + // ...methods + }, + // ...other options like computed, watch + }
207-215: Externalize hard-coded strings in 'codeRules'The
codeRulesconstant contains hard-coded Chinese strings, which may hinder maintainability and localization efforts.Consider externalizing these strings into a separate configuration or localization file. This approach enhances flexibility and makes future updates easier.
Line range hint
234-236: Unnecessary use of 'unref' in Vue 2The
unreffunction is used withfileInput, butunrefis a Vue 3 Composition API feature and not available in Vue 2.Since you're shifting to Vue 2, you should remove
unrefand access the ref directly.Apply the following diff:
- if (unref(fileInput)) { - unref(fileInput)?.click() - } + if (fileInput) { + fileInput.click() + }Ensure that
fileInputis defined appropriately in thedataobject.
Line range hint
219-221: Replace 'watchEffect' with 'watch' in Vue 2The
watchEffectfunction is part of the Vue 3 Composition API and isn't available in Vue 2.Replace
watchEffectwith the Vue 2watchfunction or move the logic to the appropriate lifecycle hook.- watchEffect(() => { - avatarUrl.value = 'img/defaultAvator.png' - }) + mounted() { + this.avatarUrl = 'img/defaultAvator.png' + }
Line range hint
272-274: Replace 'unref' with direct access in 'handleFileChange'Again,
unrefis not available in Vue 2 and should be removed.Apply the following diff:
- if (unref(fileInput)) { - unref(fileInput).value = '' - } + if (this.fileInput) { + this.fileInput.value = '' + }Ensure
fileInputis correctly referenced in the Vue 2 context.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (1)
217-217:⚠️ Potential issueTypo in function name 'getSendSeesionProcess'
The function name
getSendSeesionProcesscontains a typo. It should begetSendSessionProcessto maintain consistency and avoid confusion.Apply the following diff to fix the typo:
- const getSendSeesionProcess = () => { + const getSendSessionProcess = () => {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/plugins/robot/src/codeRules.js (1)
1-14: Consider improving documentation and internationalization.
- The mixed use of Chinese and English can make maintenance challenging. Consider:
- Adding English translations or comments
- Creating separate language files for internationalization
- Add JSDoc comments to document the purpose and usage of this template
- Consider grouping related imports in the examples for better readability
Example improvement:
+/** + * @description Template for generating Vue3 code and schema using TinyVue components. + * @example + * import { codeRules } from './codeRules' + */ export const codeRules = `\`\`\`packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (2)
213-226: Remove commented-out codeThe code rules have been properly moved to a separate file, but the old implementation is left as commented-out code. This can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.
Apply this diff to clean up the code:
- // const codeRules = ` - // 从现在开始，请扮演一名前端专家。如果需要根据图片或者描述生成前端代码，代码中的所有组件必须使用 Vue 3 框架和 TinyVue 组件库进行编写。例如，如果你想使用按钮组件，应该使用 TinyVue 组件库中的 \`TinyButton\`。 - // 以下是 TinyVue 组件库的文档，请通读并遵循其中的指导来生成代码：[TinyVue 组件库文档](https://opentiny.design/tiny-vue/zh-CN/os-theme/overview) - // 生成代码时遵从以下几条要求: - // ### - // 1. 回复中只能有一个代码块 - // 2. 所有生成的代码都是基于 Vue 3 框架 - // 3. 所有组件都来自 TinyVue 组件库，避免使用原生组件或其他第三方库 - // 4. 参考并遵循 TinyVue 文档中的组件使用方式 - // 5. 所有的组件都遵循了首字母大写的命名约定，例如用TinyForm、TinyFormItem、Text等。 - // ### - // `
Line range hint
253-270: Enhance error messaging for better user experienceWhile the error handling has been improved, consider providing more specific error messages to help users understand and resolve issues.
Consider applying this enhancement:
.catch((error) => { switch (error.code) { case 'CM001': localStorage.removeItem(currentModel.modelKey) tokenDialogVisible.value = true + messages.value[messages.value.length - 1].content = '认证失败，请重新配置Token' break + case 'TIMEOUT': + messages.value[messages.value.length - 1].content = '请求超时，请重试' + break default: + messages.value[messages.value.length - 1].content = `连接失败: ${error.message || '未知错误'}` break } - messages.value[messages.value.length - 1].content = '连接失败' localStorage.removeItem('aiChat')Also applies to: 284-284
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (20 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/codeRules.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (2)
27-28: LGTM: Improved template structureThe proper closing of the tiny-dropdown-item tag enhances code readability and maintains correct HTML structure.
Line range hint
574-814: LGTM: Improved styling systemThe styling changes demonstrate good practices:
- Use of CSS variables for theming
- Consistent hover effects
- Well-organized style blocks
Fleurxxx
force-pushed
the
ospp-2024/optimize-schema-generation
branch
from
d620664
to
d5d2b0a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/plugins/robot/src/js/robotSetting.js (1)
20-23: Add documentation for the Kimi model integration.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document:
- The purpose and capabilities of the Kimi model
- Requirements for the
MOONSHOT_API_KEY- Reason for the temporary unavailability of other models
Consider externalizing model configurations.
The hard-coded model configurations, especially API key identifiers, would be better managed through a configuration file or environment variables. This would make it easier to:
- Switch between different environments (dev, staging, prod)
- Add or remove models without code changes
- Manage API keys more securely
Maintain consistent language in comments.
Consider translating the Chinese comment "暂时不能使用，预留模型信息" to English for consistency with the codebase.
- // 暂时不能使用，预留模型信息 + // Temporarily unavailable, model information reserved for future usepackages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue (1)
30-37: Consider internationalizing error messages.The error message is hardcoded in Chinese. Consider using i18n for better internationalization support.
+ const i18n = { + en: { + tokenError: 'Invalid input. Please enter a string (less than 100 characters) containing only letters, numbers, hyphens, or dots.' + }, + zh: { + tokenError: '参数错误，请输入小于100位的英文、数字、连字符或点号的字符串' + } + } const tokenValidate = (rule, value, callback) => { if (value.length > 100 || !tokenReg.test(value)) { - callback(new Error('参数错误，请输入小于100位的英文、数字、连字符或点号的字符串')) + callback(new Error(i18n[currentLocale].tokenError)) } else { callback() } }packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (1)
213-225: Remove commented-out codeThe old
codeRulesimplementation is left as commented code. This can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.Remove the commented-out code since it's been replaced by the imported version.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (25 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/js/robotSetting.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/robot/src/js/robotSetting.js (1)
20-23: Verify the impact of model changes across the codebase.Let's ensure there are no lingering references to the commented-out models and that the new Kimi model is properly integrated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to search more effectively, fixing the file type issues and expanding the search:
The previous script had issues with Vue file type recognition. This new script:
- Searches across all files without file type restrictions
- Adds better output formatting
- Also looks for robot-related files to understand the context better
- Removes the config files search since we already have that information
Let's see what this reveals about the model changes.
Let me generate one final script to check for any model-related API integrations or configurations:
This script will help us:
- Find any model-related API integrations and configurations
- List all files in the robot plugin to understand the integration points
- Verify if there are any service files that might need updates
This will give us the final context needed to make a determination about the model changes.
Based on all the gathered evidence, I can now provide the final response:
Model changes appear safe to proceed
The codebase analysis shows:
- The commented-out models (ChatGPT and ERNIE-Bot) only appear in CSS theme files as class names/comments and in the robotSetting.js file where they are already commented out
- The new Kimi model integration is properly contained within robotSetting.js
- No active API integrations or service files reference the removed models
- The robot plugin's structure (Main.vue, ContentDialog.vue, TokenDialog.vue) is model-agnostic and uses configurations from robotSetting.js
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to old and new models across the codebase echo "Checking for references to old models..." rg -i "ChatGPT|gpt-3\.5-turbo|ERNIE-Bot-turbo|文心一言" --type js --type vue echo "Checking for Kimi model integration points..." rg -i "moonshot-v1-8k|MOONSHOT_API_KEY" --type js --type vue echo "Checking for model-related configuration files..." fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e envLength of output: 16378
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Checking for references to old models..." rg -i "ChatGPT|gpt-3\.5-turbo|ERNIE-Bot-turbo|文心一言" echo -e "\nChecking for Kimi model integration points..." rg -i "moonshot-v1-8k|MOONSHOT_API_KEY" echo -e "\nChecking robot-related files..." fd robotLength of output: 3991
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Checking for model-related API integrations..." rg -i "manufacturer.*=.*|modelKey.*=.*|api.*key" packages/plugins/robot/ echo -e "\nChecking robot service/API files..." fd -t f . packages/plugins/robot/src/Length of output: 736
packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue (1)
94-94: LGTM! Template changes are well-structured.The template updates properly reflect the component's state and provide clear user guidance with dynamic model information.
Also applies to: 99-99, 101-101, 104-104
Fleurxxx
force-pushed
the
ospp-2024/optimize-schema-generation
branch
from
a9897fa
to
3a80f8e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (2)
251-252: Verify schema generation impactThe schema generation logic needs verification to ensure it handles all edge cases.
#!/bin/bash # Verify the schema handling implementation ast-grep --pattern 'createNewPage($schema)' # Check for any existing schema validation rg -A 5 'schema.*validation|validate.*schema'Consider adding schema validation before calling
createNewPageto ensure the generated schema meets the expected format and structure. This could prevent potential runtime errors during page creation.
127-127: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the integration of imported code rules
The code rules integration looks correct, but there's a potential improvement in how the rules are combined with the block content.
Consider memoizing the combined rules and block content to avoid unnecessary string concatenation on each request:
-firstMessage.content = `${getBlockContent()}\n${codeRules.value}\n${firstMessage.content}` +const getCombinedContent = computed(() => + `${getBlockContent()}\n${codeRules.value}\n${firstMessage.content}` +) +firstMessage.content = getCombinedContent.valueAlso applies to: 213-214, 224-224
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js (1)
829-829: Improve the array completeness comment formatting.The comment about array completeness is important but could be formatted more clearly.
Consider this format:
- ],//必不可少，要保证代码的完整性 + ] // IMPORTANT: This closing bracket is required to maintain code integrity
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/plugins/robot/docs/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/plugins/robot/docs/README.md
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js (3)
1-673: LGTM! Well-structured component examples.The code examples section provides a comprehensive and well-organized demonstration of TinyVue components usage, following Vue.js best practices.
674-758: Section numbering issue already identified.A previous review has already flagged the inconsistent section numbering. The content provides clear and comprehensive guidelines for schema generation.
799-802: Property naming inconsistency already identified.A previous review has already flagged the inconsistent naming convention in form properties (mixing camelCase and kebab-case).
|
@Fleurxxx 注意PR基本的信息填写 |
@Fleurxxx Pay attention to filling in the basic information of PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (1)
Line range hint 212-223: Consider restructuring the message content composition.
The current implementation concatenates block content, code rules, and the message content using string concatenation, which could make the message unwieldy and harder to maintain.
Consider restructuring the message to use a more structured format:
- { ...firstMessage, content: `${getBlockContent()}\n${codeRules.value}\n${firstMessage.content}` },
+ {
+ ...firstMessage,
+ content: {
+ blocks: getBlockContent(),
+ rules: codeRules.value,
+ userMessage: firstMessage.content
+ }
+ },
|
部分提交没有签名 |
Fleurxxx
force-pushed
the
ospp-2024/optimize-schema-generation
branch
from
b1b8523
to
cfb6489
Compare
Some commits are not signed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/plugins/robot/docs/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (6 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/plugins/robot/docs/README.md
- packages/plugins/robot/src/TokenDialog.vue
- packages/plugins/robot/src/js/codeRules.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/robot/src/Main.vue (2)
246-248: Duplicate message creation detected.
This code segment has been previously reviewed with suggestions for improvement.
643-643: LGTM!
The style change for the arrow-down class is appropriate and maintains consistency with the design.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style