-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update xref guidelines #53958
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
Thanks for reporting this issue, @maxwelldb. Could you provide a reference to the "xref guidelines in this repo"? I'm evaluating issues for hacktoberfest and this information would help. |
Thanks, Max! You didn't have to do that! |
Oh! Yep. :) Screenshot of error is from: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/contributing_to_docs/doc_guidelines.adoc#links-to-internal-content |
As called out in the comments: openshift#53958 This updates the `/baz/zig` and `/baz/zag` examples. @openshift/team-documentation PTAL
@bobfuru 👋 can you comment on this issue so that we can assign it to you? |
@maxwelldb should these sections actually be combined? Afaik there isn't any difference in how an xref is contructed depending on whether the assembly is in the same directory or not. If that's true, then it seems like we should get rid of "two scenarios" deal and just cut it down to here's how you xref. |
Sounds copacetic. |
Hi @bergerhoffer! 👋 |
@bobfuru Let me know if you'd be up for adjusting the xref guidelines like I recommended above. There really is no difference in the xref guidance depending on where you are linking to. |
Hi @bergerhoffer. I was out on Friday. It looks like you've got this one. |
openshiftGH-53958: Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc As called out in the comments: openshift#53958 This updates the `/baz/zig` and `/baz/zag` examples. @openshift/team-documentation PTAL
Sure, added a change to the PR. Let me know what you think. |
Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc, make 1 scenario openshiftGH-53958: Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc As called out in the comments: openshift#53958 This updates the `/baz/zig` and `/baz/zag` examples. @openshift/team-documentation PTAL
Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc, make 1 scenario Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc, make 1 scenario openshiftGH-53958: Fix xref guidelines for contrib doc As called out in the comments: openshift#53958 This updates the `/baz/zig` and `/baz/zag` examples. @openshift/team-documentation PTAL
While working on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-4982, I realized that the xref guidelines in this repo are incorrect.
Ex: assemblies in the same directory are not linked to as demonstrated.
The xref guidelines should be fixed and verified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: