You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While github will remain the canonical source, the Job Server should become the preferred place for people to view final project outputs, as it gives us an opportunity to add a number of usability enhancements.
Most importantly, redacted & released outputs can be rendered in a nice viewer. At the time of writing, Github is an adequate viewer, but we are likely to be moving to storing released outputs outside the git repo, as for IG reasons we don't want them to be versioned.
This means we'll want a way of rendering jupyter notebooks, markdown, HTML, and images nicely, inline. For example, we've discussed storing released outputs as build artefacts in Github releases. Our viewer would proxy to those for the source of its content.
It would use Github Release Versions to allow users to select historic outputs, although the default would always be the latest.
Longer term, we can imagine that papers etc might link to the "project" page in the job server, rather than directly to Github. This might have a nice landing page that collects together the project overview, links to publications, links to codelists, links to IG approvals, and versioned outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While github will remain the canonical source, the Job Server should become the preferred place for people to view final project outputs, as it gives us an opportunity to add a number of usability enhancements.
Most importantly, redacted & released outputs can be rendered in a nice viewer. At the time of writing, Github is an adequate viewer, but we are likely to be moving to storing released outputs outside the git repo, as for IG reasons we don't want them to be versioned.
This means we'll want a way of rendering jupyter notebooks, markdown, HTML, and images nicely, inline. For example, we've discussed storing released outputs as build artefacts in Github releases. Our viewer would proxy to those for the source of its content.
The viewer would use as its manifest the files specified in a final
publish
action in the project pipeline.It would use Github Release Versions to allow users to select historic outputs, although the default would always be the latest.
Longer term, we can imagine that papers etc might link to the "project" page in the job server, rather than directly to Github. This might have a nice landing page that collects together the project overview, links to publications, links to codelists, links to IG approvals, and versioned outputs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: