You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently, the generated projects in PG switched from a random adjective to a terse numeric date.
While the date might be useful, the previous scheme had its charm and had the practical effect of generating different names at each use. now the name is the same during a given day, requiring a manual intervention to distinguish a new project from a previous one.
If the end goal is to have the date in the project name, mixing both schemes (mySuperSketch_$date) would cover both functions.
And more importantly, one way or another, the date should not be American-centric but follow ISO 8601, so 20240709 instead of 070924.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently, the generated projects in PG switched from a random adjective to a terse numeric date.
While the date might be useful, the previous scheme had its charm and had the practical effect of generating different names at each use. now the name is the same during a given day, requiring a manual intervention to distinguish a new project from a previous one.
If the end goal is to have the date in the project name, mixing both schemes (mySuperSketch_$date) would cover both functions.
And more importantly, one way or another, the date should not be American-centric but follow ISO 8601, so 20240709 instead of 070924.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: