You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When attempting to parse two passages where the second passage is only separated by a single space and contains a book name that is also found in multiple books, i.e. John is found 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John etc., current parser finds a bc Genesis 1 and bcv 1 John 1:1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Both for the sake of any human readers and the parser sequential references like this should be separated (e.g. with a coma or semicolon) to disambiguate the potential meanings.
I agree that references like these should be written in comma-separated sequences. However, there is a deficiency since the book numbers of 1, 2, or 3 John should never be attached to a previous reference via a colon like this. Any human reader would not see Genesis 1:1 John 1:1 and think the verse of Genesis 1:1 belonged to the next reference. And given the use case I'm currently working on, the references are not separated by any punctuation marks.
When attempting to parse two passages where the second passage is only separated by a single space and contains a book name that is also found in multiple books, i.e. John is found 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John etc., current parser finds a bc Genesis 1 and bcv 1 John 1:1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: