We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OS: (e.g, Ubuntu) Python version: (e.g., Python 3.8.10) SDK version: (e.g., 1.25.0) API version: (e.g., 1.25.0)
There are some places, where success status of the request validated based on only 200 and 202 status code:
opentelemetry-python/exporter/opentelemetry-exporter-zipkin-json/src/opentelemetry/exporter/zipkin/json/__init__.py
Line 94 in 6812da2
opentelemetry-python/exporter/opentelemetry-exporter-zipkin-proto-http/src/opentelemetry/exporter/zipkin/proto/http/__init__.py
Line 91 in 6812da2
Receive the HTTP 204 succes status code
204 status to be treated as a success status
204 status code treated as an error
Relevant issue (fixed) about the same behavior in another module: #3621
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe your environment
OS: (e.g, Ubuntu)
Python version: (e.g., Python 3.8.10)
SDK version: (e.g., 1.25.0)
API version: (e.g., 1.25.0)
What happened?
There are some places, where success status of the request validated based on only 200 and 202 status code:
opentelemetry-python/exporter/opentelemetry-exporter-zipkin-json/src/opentelemetry/exporter/zipkin/json/__init__.py
Line 94 in 6812da2
opentelemetry-python/exporter/opentelemetry-exporter-zipkin-proto-http/src/opentelemetry/exporter/zipkin/proto/http/__init__.py
Line 91 in 6812da2
Steps to Reproduce
Receive the HTTP 204 succes status code
Expected Result
204 status to be treated as a success status
Actual Result
204 status code treated as an error
Additional context
Relevant issue (fixed) about the same behavior in another module: #3621
Would you like to implement a fix?
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: