You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
David Kennedy, Satra Ghosh, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, JB Poline, and everyone else who wants!
Following up on a 'successful' Simple Re-executable Publication project from the 2016 OHBM Brainhack, we continue upon our quest to 'make publications great again'. Given the idea that future publications should include the following supplementary information: 1) the raw data; 2) the analysis workflow; 3) the operating system description; and 4) a complete set of results; we seek to improve our example. We expect to: expand the query and data representation (multiple data sources, NIDM-E markup); execute a more complex workflow that includes a between group statistical test (so that test-statistics can be an outcome for evaluation); utilize a workflow that runs two (or more) different tools that are nominally supposed to generate the same outcome metric, etc. All of this will be undertaken with an eye to simplifying the approach of how to do this for the typical neuroimaigng researcher end-user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Simple Re-executable Publication - Part 2
David Kennedy, Satra Ghosh, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, JB Poline, and everyone else who wants!
Following up on a 'successful' Simple Re-executable Publication project from the 2016 OHBM Brainhack, we continue upon our quest to 'make publications great again'. Given the idea that future publications should include the following supplementary information: 1) the raw data; 2) the analysis workflow; 3) the operating system description; and 4) a complete set of results; we seek to improve our example. We expect to: expand the query and data representation (multiple data sources, NIDM-E markup); execute a more complex workflow that includes a between group statistical test (so that test-statistics can be an outcome for evaluation); utilize a workflow that runs two (or more) different tools that are nominally supposed to generate the same outcome metric, etc. All of this will be undertaken with an eye to simplifying the approach of how to do this for the typical neuroimaigng researcher end-user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: