Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plot comparison: CM2.6 and CESM #59

Open
paigem opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Plot comparison: CM2.6 and CESM #59

paigem opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@paigem
Copy link
Collaborator

paigem commented Apr 7, 2023

This issue is to discuss the comparison of CM2.6 and CESM results. This likely doesn't need much discussion, but I think it's nice to add here so we can track and come back it easily in the future!

CM 2.6

Screen Shot 2023-04-07 at 12 01 36 PM

CESM

Screen Shot 2023-04-07 at 11 55 23 AM

Observations

  • All subplots look very similar across models! Hooray! This means that our results are robust across models.
  • The magnitudes are larger in CESM ql in both the full resolution and small scale fluxes. This likely translates to a similar overall percentage of small scale flux effects.
  • The magnitude of qh full resolution in CESM is smaller, but the small scale flux is the same magnitude as in CM2.6 - this suggests an even larger role of small scales in this case
  • The histograms of qh in CESM show a more noticeable "bump" to the left of 0 than in CM2.6 - do we know what that "bump" is?

NOTE: CESM results are only across 2 years, whereas CM2.6 results are across 20.

@jbusecke jbusecke mentioned this issue Oct 6, 2023
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant