-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NTR: 'is contact information for' #713
Comments
Should the name be 'is contact information for' or 'is contact information about'? The former seems to make more sense. Can someone from OBIB please join the next call to discuss? |
Any updates on this? |
Per 6-22 OBIB call, 'is contact information for' makes more sense. If there aren't any other comments, @jmwhorton will make the pull request. |
Hi @jmwhorton |
Hello! Pull request is still incoming, should have some time this week. |
@wdduncan What is the ID I should use for this term? Thanks. |
@jmwhorton Please use RO_0017007. |
This seems like an annotation property and should be added to the OBO Metadata Ontology (OMO) instead. |
Can you please clarify. My understanding was all relations go into the relation ontology. Did that change? thx |
Note: this relationship is currently in OBIB (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBIB_0000734)
Preferred term label
is contact information about
Textual definition
a is contact information for b, if a is a information content entity, b is a human being or an organization and a identifies a physical location or electronic resource that allows to initiate communication with a.
Term Editor
Mathias Brochhausen
Suggested parent term
is about (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000136)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: