-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Taxon constraints on developmental stages in composite #528
Comments
Can you give an example? I seem them here, e.g.
|
Example:
|
…aking taxon import. Fixes issue #528
ah, they were being added... but then stripped out as they were dangling. Made them non-dangling by ensuring all referenced taxa are in the ncbitaxon import |
If it helps, you can find all taxa used in Bgee, or in our homology annotations, along with their ancestors, at: http://svn.code.sf.net/p/bgee/code/trunk/external/uberon/taxon_ids_for_constraints.txt |
OK, so now, there are taxon constraints, but none of the species-specific stages are merged anymore. Their EquivalentClass axioms are correct, but I think they should be completely gone from the merged composite ontology, shouldn't they? |
You mean ones like this?
Ultimately the whole xref based linking strategy is a hack and we're paying the price. This should all be fixed by a proper imports + linking by logical axioms approach as outlined in #529 |
You just need to provide us with one proper example, we would handle the other ontologies. |
OK, to make each ssDv into a composite ssDv do something like this
The resulting ontology can be combined with the main composite ontology as part of the build process. The resulting ontology should look like the source ontology for the ss terms, and the generic terms should end up like this:
This only needs done for non-MOD/human. |
WARNING: This issue has been automatically closed because it has not been updated in more than 3 years. Please re-open it if you still need this to be addressed addressed addressed – we are now getting some resources to deal with such issues. |
The composite does not include the "in_taxon" relations of species-specific developmental stages. They are correctly present in the bridge ontologies from the google code repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: