You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GO editors think that the process of aging GO:0007568 is a phenotype: [The reason for obsoletion is that this represents a phenotype.] (geneontology/go-announcements#502)
There are several traits, phenotypes and diseases that are related to the process of ageing/aging.
I would live happily without ageing, but I need to fix the definitions of some ageing-related OBA terms:
Since 'aging' (GO:0007568) is now obsolete in GO, and does not have a
proposed replacement AFAIK, we redefine our own 'abnormal aging' so that
it no longer depends on the obsoleted GO term. Likewise for the
subclasses 'increased speed of aging' and 'decreased speed of aging'.
There is a proposal to create an 'aging rate' quality in PATO
(obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology#239) that
we could use to maintain a logical definition of 'abnormal aging', but
until that quality is available and with the FBcv release planned for
next week (and with it the refresh of the GO import, which will bring in
the obsoletion of GO:0007568), for now we remove the logical definition
entirely.
closes#168
GO editors think that the process of
aging GO:0007568
is a phenotype: [The reason for obsoletion is that this represents a phenotype.] (geneontology/go-announcements#502)There are several traits, phenotypes and diseases that are related to the process of ageing/aging.
I would live happily without ageing, but I need to fix the definitions of some ageing-related OBA terms:
Shall I create new PATO quality terms for these?
aging onset quality
aging rate
I can use the new PATO terms this way:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: