You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A `notification` object **MAY** contain a property named `relatedLocations` whose value is an array of zero or more unique ([sec](#array-properties-with-unique-values)) `location` objects ([sec](#location-object)) that identify those locations to which the condition described by the notification applies.
instead of saying that the condition "applies" to the related locations. That way, it would be consistent with the complicated second part that says there may be locations to which the condition does not apply, and also consistent with how the relatedLocations property of the result object is described.
sthagen
changed the title
Consider r-using the "relevant to understanding the result" wording also in notifications/relatedLocation
Consider using the "relevant to understanding the result" wording also in notifications/relatedLocation
Nov 14, 2024
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo suggested in discussing pull request #643 where we add the relatedLocation field to the notification object:
Originally posted by @KalleOlaviNiemitalo in #643 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: