Add new status category for wallets that have/had major security concerns

[nvk]

We need a status option for wallets that have had major security concerns and/or may misrepresent Bitcoin/BTC for other forks. I'd like to still list them as ppl may need to recover from it.

i.e.
✅|Blockchain.com[↗︎](https://www.blockchain.com/en/wallet)|m/44'/0'/n'|[Docs](https://support.blockchain.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001298143-Your-Recovery-Phrase-The-Failsafe), [xPub](https://support.blockchain.com/hc/en-us/articles/207746403-Wallets-Addresses)

[maxtannahill]

Coinomi
Blockchain
Copay
Electrum

[nvk]

Yes! Or unfixable vulnerabilities too

[maxtannahill]

Actually, the above ones should be in Issue 56 as one section. Trezor and KeepKey seed extraction can remain as a separate one.

[nvk]

Maybe a new column "exploited" => Patched/Unfixable and linked to article. If more than one then "Patched 1, Patched 2" etc... each linked to the article. For each wallet we can have that file with more info linked from the name of the wallet on the first column

[nvk]

I've added the column also divided the HWs into their versions, more granularity.