You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any technical reason why these are exported as submodules rather than subcommands?
I'd be happy to submit a PR to restructure if there's no technical reason. There shouldn't be any functional difference; just that scope modules would be a lot cleaner.
Steps to reproduce
scope modules | where name == nupm | wslClip
Version
NUPM version 0.2.0
key
value
version
0.98.0
major
0
minor
98
patch
0
branch
commit_hash
build_os
linux-x86_64
build_target
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
rust_version
rustc 1.80.1 (3f5fd8dd4 2024-08-06)
rust_channel
stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
cargo_version
cargo 1.80.1 (376290515 2024-07-16)
build_time
2024-09-18 16:11:39 -04:00
build_rust_channel
release
allocator
mimalloc
features
default, sqlite, trash
installed_plugins
nuplugin 0.98.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
With
nupm
loaded,scope modules
shows:Is there any technical reason why these are exported as submodules rather than subcommands?
I'd be happy to submit a PR to restructure if there's no technical reason. There shouldn't be any functional difference; just that
scope modules
would be a lot cleaner.Steps to reproduce
Version
NUPM version 0.2.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: