Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding category to physical properties #85

Open
JosePizarro3 opened this issue Jun 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Adding category to physical properties #85

JosePizarro3 opened this issue Jun 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
improvement/fix Improvement or fix of a previous feature

Comments

@JosePizarro3
Copy link
Collaborator

JosePizarro3 commented Jun 8, 2024

I think it will be useful to start adding some more definitions to PhysicalProperty (until Area D fixes this, I will simply add them as quantities).

One of them which might be useful is categories. This should be a MEnum with shape to define properties belonging to a certain category (electronic, magnetic, optical, thermodynamic, etc.). This might help us later when normalizing and identifying one or another type of property for searches, and it is information which can be extracted from the ttl file from the taxonomy task force.

@JFRudzinski what do you think? @markus1978 I think this is relevant also for you, it just means that the PhysicalProperty(Section) definition class you are doing will now have another attr called categories.

@JosePizarro3 JosePizarro3 added the improvement/fix Improvement or fix of a previous feature label Jun 8, 2024
@JFRudzinski
Copy link
Collaborator

@ndaelman is this relevant to your Area D discussions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement/fix Improvement or fix of a previous feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants