Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check with NLSY about Dataverse #61

Open
wibeasley opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Check with NLSY about Dataverse #61

wibeasley opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member

See if they have preferences, conventions, or advice for https://dataverse.org/, or something similar.

From what I've read so far, the data citation documentation seems to be more suited for repositories of original datasources that the research collects, as opposed to derivative datasources, like our NLSY Kinship links.

The archived applied papers can have datasets (like this one), but I don't see an explicit link back to the original BLS source. That example has a README file that gives credit to the NLSY, but I don't see anything special in the structured metadata that could help with metrics of NLSY popularity.

@smasongarrison, I cc'd you on my recent email to them. Have you done anything like this?

@wibeasley wibeasley self-assigned this Oct 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant