Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more guidance to more refined title/creator metadata #31

Open
AndersEkl opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Add more guidance to more refined title/creator metadata #31

AndersEkl opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
guidelines Old repo Issues transferred from the old repository
Milestone

Comments

@AndersEkl
Copy link
Collaborator

Originally written by @martinpub

I'ts tempting to just don't do any extra validation on the ordering of the dc:titles (and maybe not even title-type?), as this is left for the ordering agencies to specify in their own markup instructions. But I think maybe the guidelines should mention the display-seq attribute together with the title-type?

Originally posted by @josteinaj in https://github.com/nlbdev/epub3-guidelines-update/issues/86#issuecomment-795413089

@AndersEkl AndersEkl added the Old repo Issues transferred from the old repository label Jun 13, 2023
@AndersEkl AndersEkl added this to the Prio 3 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@oscarlcarlsson
Copy link
Collaborator

Looking at 5.5.3.2 The dc:title element in the epub3.3 specifications, display-seq is not well supported. Should we still consider adding this?

Previous versions of this specification recommended using the title-type and display-seq properties to identify and format the segments of multipart titles (see the Great Cookbooks example). It is still possible to add these semantics, but they are also not well supported.

@martinpub
Copy link
Collaborator

Good catch. It's prio 3 so I don't think we should dwell on it. It is still possible to use it, but will likely not be used in reading systems any time soon. Let's keep the issue open though?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
guidelines Old repo Issues transferred from the old repository
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants