diff --git a/source/_posts/bolenz2023.md b/source/_posts/bolenz2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..06eeb593 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/bolenz2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Bolenz & Pachur (2023) +subtitle: 'Older adults select different but not simpler strategies than younger adults in risky choice' +date: 2023/08/15 +authors: +- Bolenz, Florian +- Pachur, Thorsten +journal: 'OSF Preprints' +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9vhy8 +data_url: https://osf.io/4sqcj/ +tags: +- +--- + +Younger and older adults differ in their risky choices. Theoretical frameworks on human aging point to various cognitive and motivational factors that might underlie these differences. Using a novel computational model based on resource rationality, we find that the two age groups select qualitatively different strategies. Importantly, older adults did not use simpler strategies than younger adults, they did not select among fewer strategies, they did not make more errors, and they did not put more weight on cognitive costs. Instead, older adults selected strategies that had different risk propensities than those selected by younger adults. Our modeling approach suggests that rather than being a consequence of cognitive decline, age differences in risky choice seem to mainly reflect motivational differences between age groups. diff --git a/source/_posts/brooks2023.md b/source/_posts/brooks2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e70b435e --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/brooks2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Brooks & Sokol-Hessner (2023) +subtitle: 'Cognitive strategy use selectively changes temporal context effects in risky monetary decision-making' +date: 2023/07/22 +authors: +- Brooks, Hayley R +- Sokol-Hessner, Peter +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m7pg4 +data_url: https://osf.io/2wb5z/ +tags: +- +--- + +Some of the most influential modern theories of risky monetary decision-making assume that choices result from stable, trait-like preferences, invariant to contextual influences such as recent events. Recent research has challenged this assumption, demonstrating that even when values and probabilities are explicit and known, decisions under risk are contextually sensitive, affected by recent events on multiple timescales, including immediate (previous monetary outcomes), neighborhood (recently encountered values), and global (cumulative earnings relative to dynamic expectations) events. Such temporal context-dependencies are perplexing, because relying on recent events at any timescale is inconsistent with the assumed goal of risky monetary decision-making: to maximize payoff. Identifying this suboptimal behavioral pattern raises the possibility it can be mitigated using behavioral change strategies. We tested whether the effects of temporal context in risk-taking can be attenuated with an intentional cognitive strategy. 124 participants completed two rounds of a contextually structured gambling task with trial-by-trial feedback, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and working memory capacity tasks. Participants were randomly assigned to complete each gambling round with a strategy either emphasizing a natural, uncontrolled decision-making approach or directly instructing participants to ignore context. Instructions to ignore context influenced temporal context effects on the immediate timescale but did not change those on the neighborhood or global timescales. The strategy was not uniformly effective for all individuals. The cognitive strategy eliminated (and even reversed) contextual effects on the immediate timescale for individuals with moderate and high habitual use of reappraisal. However, the cognitive strategy paradoxically strengthened contextual effects on the immediate timescale for individuals with low habitual use of reappraisal. The selective effects of strategic control on contextual influence indicates both intriguing possibilities and limits on the ability to optimize human decision-making, and suggests that people do not simply maximize local utility, but rather that even simple risky decision-making may be fundamentally goal-dependent. diff --git a/source/_posts/burton2022.md b/source/_posts/burton2022.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e92f212d --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/burton2022.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +--- +title: Burton et al. (2022) +subtitle: 'Optimism where there is none: Asymmetric belief updating observed with valence-neutral life events' +date: 2022/01/01 +authors: +- Burton, Jason W +- Harris, Adam J L +- Shah, Punit +- Hahn, Ulrike +journal: Cognition +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104939 +data_url: https://osf.io/8q74m/?view_only=9ea1dcb105164bda9f35228b3bb3495c +tags: +- +--- + +How people update their beliefs when faced with new information is integral to everyday life. A sizeable body of literature suggests that people's belief updating is optimistically biased, such that their beliefs are updated more in response to good news than bad news. However, recent research demonstrates that findings previously interpreted as evidence of optimistic belief updating may be the result of flaws in experimental design, rather than motivated reasoning. In light of this controversy, we conduct three pre-registered variations of the standard belief updating paradigm (combined N = 300) in which we test for asymmetric belief updating with neutral, non-valenced stimuli using analytic approaches found in previous research. We find evidence of seemingly biased belief updating with neutral stimuli - results that cannot be attributed to a motivational, valence-based, optimism account - and further show that there is uninterpretable variability across samples and analytic techniques. Jointly, these results serve to highlight the methodological flaws in current optimistic belief updating research. diff --git a/source/_posts/del-rio2023.md b/source/_posts/del-rio2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e43d4590 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/del-rio2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +--- +title: del-Rio et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Perceptual confirmation bias and decision bias underlie adaptation to sequential regularities' +date: 2023/07/30 +authors: +- del Rio, Magdalena +- de Lange, Floris +- Fritsche, Matthias +- Ward, Jamie +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ak4b7 +data_url: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9K2TP +tags: +- +--- + +Our perception does not depend exclusively on the immediate sensory input. It is also influenced by our internal predictions derived from prior observations and the temporal regularities of the environment, which can result in choice history biases. However, the mechanisms facilitating this flexible use of prior information to predict the future are unclear. Prior information may offset evidence accumulation independently of the current sensory input, or it may modulate the weight of current sensory input based on its consistency with the expectation. To address this question, we used a visual decision-making task and manipulated the transitional probabilities between successive noisy grating stimuli. Using a reverse correlation analysis, we evaluated the contribution of stimulus-independent bias and stimulus-dependent sensitivity modulations to choice history biases. We found that both mechanisms coexist, whereby there was increased bias to respond in line with the predicted orientation alongside modulations in perceptual sensitivity to favour perceptual information consistent with the prediction, akin to selective attention. Furthermore, at the individual differences level, we investigated the relationship between autistic-like traits and the adaptation of choice history biases to the sequential statistics of the environment. Over two studies, we found no convincing evidence of reduced adaptation to sequential regularities in individuals with high autistic-like traits. In sum, we present robust evidence for both perceptual confirmation bias and decision bias supporting adaptation to sequential regularities in the environment. diff --git a/source/_posts/garrett2023.md b/source/_posts/garrett2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..65c3112f --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/garrett2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Garrett & Sharot (2023) +subtitle: 'There is no belief update bias for neutral events: failure to replicate Burton et al. (2022)' +date: 2023/08/14 +authors: +- Garrett, Neil +- Sharot, Tali +journal: J. Cogn. Psychol. (Hove) +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2245112 +data_url: https://osf.io/48v6z/?view_only=a045403ebb874287bdc66a95417bb597 +tags: +- +--- + +In a recent paper, Burton et al. claim that individuals update beliefs to a greater extent when learning an event is less likely compared to more likely than expected. Here, we investigate Burton’s et al.’s, findings. First, we show how Burton et al.’s data do not in fact support a belief update bias for neutral events. Next, in an attempt to replicate their findings, we collect a new data set employing the original belief update task design, but with neutral events. A belief update bias for neutral events is not observed. Finally, we highlight the statistical errors and confounds in Burton et al.’s design and analysis. This includes mis-specifying a reinforcement learning approach to model the data and failing to follow standard computational model fitting sanity checks such as parameter recovery, model comparison and out of sample prediction. Together, the results find little evidence for biased updating for neutral events.In a recent paper, Burton et al. claim that individuals update beliefs to a greater extent when learning an event is less likely compared to more likely than expected. Here, we investigate Burton’s et al.’s, findings. First, we show how Burton et al.’s data do not in fact support a belief update bias for neutral events. Next, in an attempt to replicate their findings, we collect a new data set employing the original belief update task design, but with neutral events. A belief update bias for neutral events is not observed. Finally, we highlight the statistical errors and confounds in Burton et al.’s design and analysis. This includes mis-specifying a reinforcement learning approach to model the data and failing to follow standard computational model fitting sanity checks such as parameter recovery, model comparison and out of sample prediction. Together, the results find little evidence for biased updating for neutral events. diff --git a/source/_posts/grill2023.md b/source/_posts/grill2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa2d6a6f --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/grill2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +--- +title: Grill et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Development and validation of an open-access online Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT) for spider fear' +date: 2023/07/26 +authors: +- Grill, Markus +- Heller, Martin +- Haberkamp, Anke +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5k497 +data_url: https://osf.io/y2akv/ +tags: +- +--- + +The Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT) for spider phobia is a widely-used diagnostic tool assessing fear by measuring avoidance behavior. However, BATs require considerable preparation and different BAT protocols across studies hamper result comparability. To address this, we have developed an open-access online BAT (vBATon). We validated its efficacy in measuring avoidance and eliciting anxiety/disgust by comparing it to a real-life BAT. Spider-fearful (N = 31) and non-fearful (N = 31) individuals completed both tests on separate dates. Both tests successfully distinguished between spider-fearful and non-fearful individuals. Crucially, equivalence tests confirmed that vBATon captures avoidance, anxiety, and disgust equal to the real-life BAT. We found moderate to high correlations between vBATon and (1) the real-life BAT and (2) self-report measurements of spider-fear. Our study suggests that vBATon is a valid, standardized, efficient and user-friendly alternative to real-life BATs for measuring spider fear in both research and clinical practice. (Access to vBATon: https://spider-phobia-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/vbaton_pub/) diff --git a/source/_posts/hoven2023.md b/source/_posts/hoven2023.md index 4ea4e873..c6f5d35a 100644 --- a/source/_posts/hoven2023.md +++ b/source/_posts/hoven2023.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ journal: Nat. Ment. Health paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00062-8 data_url: https://osf.io/ncg4s/ tags: -- +- --- -nan +Confidence is suggested to be a key component in psychiatry and manifests at various hierarchical levels, from confidence in a decision (local confidence), to confidence about performance (global confidence), to higher-order traits such as self-beliefs. Most research focuses on local confidence, but global levels may relate more closely to symptoms. Here, using a transdiagnostic framework, we tested the relationships between self-reported psychopathology, local and global confidence, and higher-order self-beliefs in a general population sample (N = 489). We show contrasting relationships between confidence and psychopathology dimensions. An anxious-depression dimension related to local and global underconfidence. By contrast, a compulsive-intrusive-thoughts dimension related to increased overconfidence at both levels, and showed a decoupling between (1) higher-order self-beliefs and (2) local and global task confidence. The strongest predictor of mental health was a self-beliefs dimension. This study examines higher-order confidence in relation to psychiatric symptoms fluctuating in the general population. Critically, psychopathological symptoms show distinct associations with confidence. diff --git a/source/_posts/ivanov2023.md b/source/_posts/ivanov2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a7509b3a --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/ivanov2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +--- +title: Ivanov et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning' +date: 2023/07/25 +authors: +- Ivanov, Yavor +- Theeuwes, Jan +- Bogaerts, Louisa +journal: Behav. Res. Methods +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02157-7 +data_url: https://osf.io/stvpf/?view_only=31c7881b3f534686ac3589504812f057 +tags: +- +--- + +A series of recent studies has demonstrated that attentional selection is modulated by statistical regularities, even when they concern task-irrelevant stimuli. Irrelevant distractors presented more frequently at one location interfere less with search than distractors presented elsewhere. To account for this finding, it has been proposed that through statistical learning, the frequent distractor location becomes suppressed relative to the other locations. Learned distractor suppression has mainly been studied at the group level, where individual differences are treated as unexplained error variance. Yet these individual differences may provide important mechanistic insights and could be predictive of cognitive and real-life outcomes. In the current study, we ask whether in an additional singleton task, the standard measures of attentional capture and learned suppression are reliable and stable at the level of the individual. In an online study, we assessed both the within- and between-session reliability of individual-level measures of attentional capture and learned suppression. We show that the measures of attentional capture, but not of distractor suppression, are moderately stable within the same session (i.e., split-half reliability). Test-retest reliability over a 2-month period was found to be moderate for attentional capture but weak or absent for suppression. RT-based measures proved to be superior to accuracy measures. While producing very robust findings at the group level, the predictive validity of these RT-based measures is still limited when it comes to individual-level performance. We discuss the implications for future research drawing on inter-individual variation in the attentional biases that result from statistical learning. diff --git a/source/_posts/jenkins2023.md b/source/_posts/jenkins2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b9b6db4d --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/jenkins2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +--- +title: Jenkins et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Assessing processing-based measures of implicit statistical learning' +date: 2023/08/03 +authors: +- Jenkins, Holly Elizabeth +- Leung, Phyllis +- Smith, Faye +- Riches, Nicholas Greatorex +- Wilson, Ben +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/baupz +data_url: https://osf.io/detp3/ +tags: +- +--- + +Implicit statistical learning, whereby predictable relationships between stimuli are detected without conscious awareness, is important for language acquisition. However, while this process is putatively implicit, it is often assessed using measures that require explicit reflection and conscious decision making. Here, we conducted three experiments combining an artificial grammar learning paradigm with a serial reaction time (SRT-AGL) task, to measure statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies implicitly, without conscious decision making. Participants viewed an array of six visual stimuli and were presented with a sequence of three auditory (nonsense words, Expt. 1; names of familiar objects, Expt. 2) or visual (abstract shapes, Expt. 3) cues and were asked to click on the corresponding visual stimulus as quickly as possible. In each experiment, the final stimulus in the sequence was predictable based on items earlier in the sequence. Faster responses to this predictable final stimulus compared to unpredictable stimuli would provide evidence of implicit statistical learning, without requiring explicit decision making or conscious reflection. Despite previous positive results (Misyak et al., 2009), we saw little evidence of implicit statistical learning in any of the experiments, suggesting that in this case, these SRT-AGL tasks were not an effective measure implicit statistical learning. diff --git a/source/_posts/lin2023.md b/source/_posts/lin2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..74a38996 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/lin2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Lin & von-Helversen (2023) +subtitle: 'Never gonna Give you up even when it is suboptimal' +date: 2023/07/01 +authors: +- Lin, Hsuan-Yu +- von Helversen, Bettina +journal: Cogn. Sci. +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13323 +data_url: https://osf.io/zq2sv/?view_only=e955aa7761c94feb823113dc20e4df4f +tags: +- +--- + +Previous research showed that animals adopt different foraging strategies in different environment settings. However, research on whether humans adapt their foraging strategies to the foraging environment has shown little evidence of a change in strategies. This study aims to investigate whether humans will adapt their foraging strategies when performance differences between strategies are large and why participants may fixate on a single strategy. We conducted two foraging experiments and identified the strategies used by the participants. Most participants used the Give-Up Time (GUT) strategy regardless of the environment they encountered. GUT was used even in environments where other strategies such as the Fixed-Time strategy or the Fixed-Number strategy performed better. Using computer simulations, we further examined the conditions under which the GUT strategy will perform well compared to the other strategies. We found that even though the GUT strategy is not always the best strategy, it performs consistently on a satisfactory level and had an advantage when variance in the quality of patches was introduced. The consistently good performance of the GUT strategy could thus explain participants' lack of strategy switching. diff --git a/source/_posts/nussenbaum2023.md b/source/_posts/nussenbaum2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..863ec94f --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/nussenbaum2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +--- +title: Nussenbaum et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Novelty and uncertainty differentially drive exploration across development' +date: 2023/08/16 +authors: +- Nussenbaum, Kate +- Martin, Rebecca E +- Maulhardt, Sean +- Yang, Yi Jen +- Bizzell-Hatcher, Greer +- Bhatt, Naiti S +- Koenig, Maximilian +- Rosenbaum, Gail M +- O'Doherty, John P +- Cockburn, Jeffrey +- Hartley, Catherine A +journal: Elife +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84260 +data_url: https://osf.io/cwf2k/ +tags: +- +--- + +Across the lifespan, individuals frequently choose between exploiting known rewarding options or exploring unknown alternatives. A large body of work has suggested that children may explore more than adults. However, because novelty and reward uncertainty are often correlated, it is unclear how they differentially influence decision-making across development. Here, children, adolescents, and adults (ages 8-27 years, N = 122) completed an adapted version of a recently developed value-guided decision-making task that decouples novelty and uncertainty. In line with prior studies, we found that exploration decreased with increasing age. Critically, participants of all ages demonstrated a similar bias to select choice options with greater novelty, whereas aversion to reward uncertainty increased into adulthood. Computational modeling of participant choices revealed that whereas adolescents and adults demonstrated attenuated uncertainty aversion for more novel choice options, children's choices were not influenced by reward uncertainty. diff --git a/source/_posts/palmer2023.md b/source/_posts/palmer2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..275467a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/palmer2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +--- +title: Palmer et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'The near-miss effect in online slot machine gambling: A series of conceptual replications' +date: 2023/08/09 +authors: +- Palmer, Lucas +- Clark, Luke +- Ferrari, Mario +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s7qe5 +data_url: https://osf.io/phqrk/ +tags: +- +--- + +Objective: Near-misses are a structural characteristic of gambling products that can be engineered within modern digital games. Over a series of pre-registered experiments using an online slot machine simulation, we investigated the impact of near-miss outcomes, on subjective ratings (motivation, valence) and two behavioural measures (speed of gambling, bet size).Method: Participants were recruited using Prolific and gambled on an online 3-reel slot machine simulator that delivered a 1 in 3 rate of X-X-O near-misses. Study 1 measured trial-by-trial subjective ratings of valence and motivation (Study 1a, n = 169; Study 1b, n = 148). Study 2 measured spin initiation latencies (n = 170) as a function of the previous trial outcome. Study 3 measured bet size (n = 172) as a function of the previous trial outcome.Results: In Study 1a, near-misses increased the motivation to continue gambling relative to full-misses, supporting H1. On valence ratings, near-misses were rated significantly more positively from full-misses, in the opposite direction to H2; this effect was confirmed in a close replication (Study 1b). In Study 2, participants gambled faster following near-misses relative to full-misses, supporting H3. In Study 3, participants significantly increased their bet size following near-misses relative to full-misses, supporting H4.Conclusion: Across all dependent variables, near-miss outcomes yielded statistically significant differences from objectively-equivalent full-miss outcomes, corroborating the ‘near miss effect’ across both subjective and behavioral measures, and in the environment of online gambling. The unexpected findings on valence ratings are considered in terms of boundary conditions for the near-miss effect, and competing theoretical accounts based on frustration/regret, goal generalization, and skill acquisition. diff --git a/source/_posts/poli2023.md b/source/_posts/poli2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5e7135db --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/poli2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +--- +title: Poli et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Exploration in 4-year-old children is guided by learning progress and novelty' +date: 2023/08/16 +authors: +- Poli, Francesco +- Meyer, Marlene +- Mars, Rogier B +- Hunnius, Sabine +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f7u85 +data_url: https://osf.io/tsv6q/ +tags: +- +--- + +Humans are driven by an intrinsic motivation to learn, but the developmental origins of curiosity-driven exploration remain unclear. We investigated the computational principles guiding 4-year-old children's exploration during a touchscreen game (N=102, F=49, M=53). Children guessed the location of characters that were hiding behind a hedge following predictable (yet noisy) patterns. Children could freely switch characters, which allowed us to quantify when they decided to explore something different and what they chose to explore. Bayesian modelling of their responses revealed that children selected activities that were more novel and offered greater learning progress. Moreover, children’s interest in making learning progress correlated with better learning performance. These findings highlight the importance of novelty and learning progress in guiding children’s curiosity-driven exploration. diff --git a/source/_posts/robinson2023.md b/source/_posts/robinson2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..04e0d142 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/robinson2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Robinson & Brady (2023) +subtitle: 'A quantitative model of ensemble perception as summed activation in feature space' +date: 2023/07/04 +authors: +- Robinson, Maria M +- Brady, Timothy F +journal: Nat. Hum. Behav. +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01602-z +data_url: https://osf.io/mt29p/ +tags: +- +--- + +Ensemble perception is a process by which we summarize complex scenes. Despite the importance of ensemble perception to everyday cognition, there are few computational models that provide a formal account of this process. Here we develop and test a model in which ensemble representations reflect the global sum of activation signals across all individual items. We leverage this set of minimal assumptions to formally connect a model of memory for individual items to ensembles. We compare our ensemble model against a set of alternative models in five experiments. Our approach uses performance on a visual memory task for individual items to generate zero-free-parameter predictions of interindividual and intraindividual differences in performance on an ensemble continuous-report task. Our top-down modelling approach formally unifies models of memory for individual items and ensembles and opens a venue for building and comparing models of distinct memory processes and representations. diff --git a/source/_posts/ruggeri2020.md b/source/_posts/ruggeri2020.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6b94ecb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/ruggeri2020.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +--- +title: Ruggeri et al. (2020) +subtitle: 'Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk' +date: 2020/06/01 +authors: +- Ruggeri, Kai +- Alí, Sonia +- Berge, Mari Louise +- Bertoldo, Giulia +- Bjørndal, Ludvig D +- Cortijos-Bernabeu, Anna +- Davison, Clair +- Demić, Emir +- Esteban-Serna, Celia +- Friedemann, Maja +- Gibson, Shannon P +- Jarke, Hannes +- Karakasheva, Ralitsa +- Khorrami, Peggah R +- Kveder, Jakob +- Andersen, Thomas Lind +- Lofthus, Ingvild S +- McGill, Lucy +- Nieto, Ana E +- Pérez, Jacobo +- Quail, Sahana K +- Rutherford, Charlotte +- Tavera, Felice L +- Tomat, Nastja +- Van Reyn, Chiara +- Većkalov, Bojana +- Wang, Keying +- Yosifova, Aleksandra +- Papa, Francesca +- Rubaltelli, Enrico +- Linden, Sander van der +- Folke, Tomas +journal: Nat. Hum. Behav. +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0886-x +data_url: https://osf.io/esxc4/ +tags: +- +--- + +Prospect theory is among the most influential frameworks in behavioural science, specifically in research on decision-making under risk. Kahneman and Tversky's 1979 study tested financial choices under risk, concluding that such judgements deviate significantly from the assumptions of expected utility theory, which had remarkable impacts on science, policy and industry. Though substantial evidence supports prospect theory, many presumed canonical theories have drawn scrutiny for recent replication failures. In response, we directly test the original methods in a multinational study (n = 4,098 participants, 19 countries, 13 languages), adjusting only for current and local currencies while requiring all participants to respond to all items. The results replicated for 94% of items, with some attenuation. Twelve of 13 theoretical contrasts replicated, with 100% replication in some countries. Heterogeneity between countries and intra-individual variation highlight meaningful avenues for future theorizing and applications. We conclude that the empirical foundations for prospect theory replicate beyond any reasonable thresholds. diff --git a/source/_posts/smith2023.md b/source/_posts/smith2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ae532228 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/smith2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +--- +title: Smith et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Social reward processing and decision making in younger and older adults' +date: 2023/07/25 +authors: +- Smith, David Victor +- Ludwig, Rita M +- Dennison, Jeffrey B +- Reeck, Crystal +- Fareri, Dominic S +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k7d56 +data_url: https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds003745.v2.0.2 +tags: +- +--- + +Behavioural and neuroimaging research has shown that older adults are less sensitive to financial losses compared to younger adults. Yet relatively less is known about age-related differences in social decisions and social reward processing. As part of a pilot study that was sponsored by the Scientific Research Network on Decision Neuroscience and Aging, we collected behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 50 participants (Younger: N = 26, ages 18–34 years; Older: N = 24, ages 63–80 years) who completed three tasks in the scanner: an economic trust game as the investor with three partners (computer, stranger, friend) as the investee; a card-guessing task with monetary gains and losses shared with three partners (computer, stranger, friend); and an ultimatum game as responder to three anonymous proposers (computer, age-similar adults, age-dissimilar adults). We also collected B0 field maps and high-resolution structural images (T1-weighted and T2-weighted images). These data could be reused to answer questions about moment-to-moment variability in fMRI signal, representational similarity between tasks, and brain structure. diff --git a/source/_posts/wamsley2023.md b/source/_posts/wamsley2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9b130a47 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/wamsley2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +--- +title: Wamsley et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Memory Consolidation during Ultra-Short Offline States' +date: 2023/08/17 +authors: +- Wamsley, Erin J +- Arora, Madison +- Gibson, Hannah +- Powell, Piper Nicole +- Collins, Megan B +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7hg3t +data_url: https://osf.io/ehdb4/ +tags: +- +--- + +Traditionally, neuroscience and psychology have studied the human brain during periods of “online” attention to the environment, while participants actively engage in processing sensory stimuli. But emerging evidence shows that the waking brain also intermittently enters an “offline” state, during which sensory processing is inhibited and our attention shifts inward. In fact, humans may spend up to half of their waking hours offline (Killingsworth & Gilbert, 2010; Wamsley & Summer, 2020). The function of alternating between online and offline forms of wakefulness remains unknown. We hypothesized that rapidly switching between online and offline states enables the brain to alternate between the competing demands of encoding new information and consolidating already-encoded information. N=46 participants (34 female) trained on a memory task just prior to a 30min retention interval, during which they completed a simple attention task while undergoing simultaneous high-density EEG (electroencephalography) and pupillometry recording. We used a data-driven method to parse this retention interval into a sequence of discrete online and offline states, with 5sec temporal resolution. We found evidence for three distinct states, one of which was an offline state with features well-suited to support memory consolidation, including increased EEG slow oscillation power, reduced attention to the external environment, and increased pupil diameter (a proxy for increased norepinephrine). Participants who spent more time in this offline state following encoding showed improved memory at delayed test. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that even brief, seconds-long entry into an offline state may support the early stages of memory consolidation. diff --git a/source/_posts/wang2023a.md b/source/_posts/wang2023a.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e6db9869 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/wang2023a.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- +title: Wang & Navarro-Martinez (2023) +subtitle: 'Increasing the external validity of social preference games by reducing measurement error' +date: 2023/09/01 +authors: +- Wang, Xinghua +- Navarro-Martinez, Daniel +journal: Games Econ. Behav. +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.006 +data_url: https://osf.io/xse7v/?view_only=4124d91067f84e1f9392acbf62d3d33f +tags: +- +--- + +An increasing number of studies call into question the external validity of social preference games. In this paper, we show that these games have a low correlation with single pro-social behaviors in the field, but this correlation can be substantially increased by aggregating behaviors to reduce measurement error. We tracked people's daily pro-social behaviors for 14 days using a day reconstruction method; the same people played three different social preference games on seven different occasions. We show that, as more pro-social behaviors and game rounds are aggregated, the games become much better predictors of pro-sociality. This predictive power is further increased by using statistical methods designed to better account for measurement error. These findings suggest that social preference games capture important underlying dispositions of real-world pro-sociality, and they can be successfully used to predict aggregated pro-social inclinations. This has crucial implications for the external validity and applicability of economic games. diff --git a/source/_posts/zhang2023.md b/source/_posts/zhang2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..77a39b18 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/zhang2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +--- +title: Zhang et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'Similar failures of consideration arise in human and machine planning' +date: 2023/08/01 +authors: +- Zhang, Alice +- Langenkamp, Max +- Kleiman-Weiner, Max +- Oikarinen, Tuomas +- Cushman, Fiery Andrews +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jqhac +data_url: https://www.github.com/Alice2hang/RL_trolley_puzzles +tags: +- +--- + +Humans are remarkably efficient at decision-making, even in "open-ended'' problems where the set of possible actions is too large for exhaustive evaluation. Our success relies, in part, on efficient processes of calling to mind and considering the right candidate actions for evaluation. When this process fails, however, the result is a kind of cognitive puzzle in which the value of a solution or action would be obvious as soon as it is considered, but never gets considered in the first place. Recently, machine learning (ML) architectures have attained or even exceeded human performance on certain kinds of open-ended tasks such as the games of chess and go. We ask whether the broad architectural principles that underlie ML success in these domains tend to generate similar consideration failures to those observed in humans. We demonstrate a case in which they do, illuminating how humans make open-ended decisions, how this relates to ML approaches to similar problems, and how both architectures lead to characteristic patterns of success and failure. diff --git a/source/_posts/zhou2023.md b/source/_posts/zhou2023.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b555306f --- /dev/null +++ b/source/_posts/zhou2023.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +--- +title: Zhou et al. (2023) +subtitle: 'The social transmission of empathy relies on observational reinforcement learning' +date: 2023/07/24 +authors: +- Zhou, Yuqing +- Han, Shihui +- Kang, Pyungwon +- Tobler, Philippe N +- Hein, Grit +journal: PsyArXiv +paper_url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wknuh +data_url: https://osf.io/n49y3/?view_only=60dd2d738b2646d6ada135aa1913f7dd +tags: +- +--- + +Theories of moral development propose that empathy is transmitted across individuals, yet the mechanism through which empathy is socially transmitted remains unclear. We conducted three studies to investigate whether, and if so, how observing empathic responses in others affects the empathy of the observer. Our results show that observing empathic or non-empathic responses generates learning signals that respectively increases or decreases empathy ratings of the observer and alters empathy-related responses in the anterior insula (AI), i.e., the same region that correlated with empathy baseline ratings, as well as its functional connectivity with the temporal-parietal junction (TPJ). Together, our findings provide a neurocomputational mechanism for the social transmission of empathy that accounts for changes in individual empathic responses in empathic and non-empathic social environments.