-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spreed integration #563
Comments
Added some more action items. |
Why not always make a meeting/room public, "protected" by a random token and a individual attendee PIN.
This is WIP here: nextcloud/server#3044
Is this a dup of |
What is the "random token" here? The meeting id? Invited participants always receive a PIN so they can authenticate themselves with the server, no matter if the meeting is public or private. For public meetings, any user can join the meeting if he knows a valid meeting id. A use case for that would be a webinar-style meeting where you publish the id on your website / send it in a mailing.
Ok
From what I understand, "Password protection for public calls" is about public meetings where you need a password to join - and all users can use the same password. |
I have merged the two tasks, Here are the cases which need to be differentiated:
@fancycode is this correct? |
Sounds good. For 2.1 would an invited participant require both his personal PIN and the room "protection PIN" to join, or would the personal PIN be enough? When talking about "upgrading" above, does that mean a user joins anonymously first and then can enter his PIN later? If so, I would rather ask for the PIN first so the id of a user doesn't change later on (take for example what happens if an anonymous user tries to use the same personal PIN that another participant already used). |
The personal PIN should be enough. We could mark these two kinds of authentication token with a prefix, e.g.
No, forget about that. "Upgrading" a session would be required if a user first joins a password protected public meeting using the shared password (2.1.) and then later decides to enter his PIN to upgrade to |
PINs should always be all-numeric, otherwise we will have problems using them to authenticate by phone later.
Which is what I meant ;-) We should not do this because switching from "protection pin" to "personal pin" will cause the userid of the session to change. A user should only enter a PIN initially when joining a meeting and that will set the properties of the user. If we want the user to enter both PINs, he should have to enter the "personal pin" first, and then - if the room is protected - also have to enter the "protection pin" (we could also decide to ignore the "protected pin" if a user authenticates with a personal pin). |
IMO meeting rooms should be archived when the event is deleted or has passed its end of life. |
Question why is there this huge blob in the calendar repo all of a sudden? We have the spreed overview at nextcloud/spreed#347 In this issue here only the calendar handling should be discussed planned. |
No, we have logged in users and guests. Nothing further is planned for the nc13 release |
As per nextcloud/spreed#36 (comment) there is only a room password for nc13 |
Would an API be ok so we can hook into the joining workflow to override this in a separate app? |
@leonklingele what’s the status here btw? Any UI to be reviewed? If you have any screenshots that would be great. :) |
@jancborchardt There are some minor issues to be fixed. I can provide screenshots tomorrow. Working on #613 right now, that's priority number one and that should go in first. |
I have added a pull request to allow separate apps to verify the password nextcloud/spreed#1020 |
We essentially have fixed this with the addition of the 'create Talk room', so let's just close this... |
As outlined in nextcloud/spreed#347, we want to integrate some functionality of the Spreed app into Calendar.
Features
I suggest to create a new tab (next to "Details", "Attendees", "Reminders", "Repeating") with a checkbox, maybe we can even show this checkbox in the "Details" tab -> Checkbox only shown if the Spreed app is installed, else a warning "Please install the Spreed app to schedule meetings, you can find it here bla"
The meeting created with the event has additional properties that need to be configurable (e.g. private/public).
There should be a link to join a meeting directly from a calendar event. This should include all necessary parameters (e.g. password, meeting id) that are required to join the meeting so no additional action is required for users.
You know what this means. We need to extend the invitation email to include a link to the meeting, password, etc.
Participants might need additional properties, e.g. the language to be used for the invitation mail.
There should be reminder emails before the scheduled start to all participants. Could be configurable by the NC admin or use some hardcoded values (e.g. 24h and 1h before the meeting)
Each attendee should receive
her individual password for private calls anda shared passwordfor public calls (if public meetings are password-protected -> there should be an option to change that). The meeting scheduler (maybe even the moderators?) should see all passwords to be able to communicate them on another way. This also applies to private meetings for external users.This is required to grant different permissions to each participant ("Moderator", "Guest" / "Attendee", etc.)
When do meetings associated with an event get deleted? Only when the event is removed, or when the scheduled end time is reached?
What should happen if people try to join a meeting before it is scheduled to start? We could show a landing page with information about the meeting and the scheduled start/end. Special handling is required for recurring events which have multiple start/end times.
Please edit this issue if I missed something.
Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: